WASHINGTON, DC ·
OSHA Inspection: PALOMA DEVELOPMENT, LLC.
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of PALOMA DEVELOPMENT, LLC. in 1506 Q STREET, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 340529502.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PALOMA DEVELOPMENT, LLC.
- Site address
- 1506 Q STREET, NW
- City
- WASHINGTON
- State
- DC
- ZIP
- 20009
- Mailing
- 8512 HORSESHOE LANE, POTOMAC, MD 20854
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) Exterior Rear - Employees were observed walking below a carpenter installing wood flooring on an exterior balcony without wearing hard hats and exposed to being struck by falling wood framing members, on or about 04/09/2015. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement. For the purpose of this inspection, this employer was determined to be the controlling and correcting employer on the job site. The employer is being cited under OSHAs multi-employer workplace policy.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) Exterior Rear Lower Level - A laborer was observed cutting a piece of marble using a wet saw and not provided with eye protection, on or about 04/09/2015. For the purpose of this inspection, this employer was determined to be the controlling and correcting employer on the job site. The employer is being cited under OSHAs multi-employer workplace policy.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1360
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift*: a) Exterior Rear of Building - An employee observed in the basket of a JLG articulating boom lift basket not wearing a personal fall arrest system attached to the boom or basket was exposed to a 35 ft. fall hazard, on or about 04/09/2015. For the purpose of this inspection, this employer was determined to be the controlling and correcting employer on the job site. The employer is being cited under OSHAs multi-employer workplace policy. *Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e):
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Third Floor Balcony - An employee observed standing on an unguarded balcony was exposed to a 35 ft. fall hazard, on or about 04/09/2015. For the purpose of this inspection, this employer was determined to be the controlling and correcting employer on the job site. The employer is being cited under OSHAs multi-employer workplace policy.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in DC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340529502.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.