Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: PALOMA DEVELOPMENT, LLC.

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of PALOMA DEVELOPMENT, LLC. in 1506 Q STREET, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 340529502.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Paloma Development, LLC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Paloma Development, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1506 Q STREET, NW
City
WASHINGTON
State
DC
ZIP
20009
Mailing
8512 HORSESHOE LANE, POTOMAC, MD 20854
Inspection type
Programmed Related (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
1
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2015
Abate by
Jul 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a) Exterior Rear - Employees were observed walking below a carpenter installing wood flooring on an exterior balcony without wearing hard hats and exposed to being struck by falling wood framing members, on or about 04/09/2015.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.  For the purpose of this inspection, this employer was determined to be the controlling and correcting employer on the job site. The employer is being cited under OSHAs multi-employer workplace policy.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a) Exterior Rear Lower Level - A laborer was observed cutting a piece of marble using a wet saw and not provided with eye protection, on or about 04/09/2015.  For the purpose of this inspection, this employer was determined to be the controlling and correcting employer on the job site. The employer is being cited under OSHAs multi-employer workplace policy.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1360

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift*:  a) Exterior Rear of Building - An employee observed in the basket of a JLG articulating boom lift basket not wearing a personal fall arrest system attached to the boom or basket was exposed to a 35 ft. fall hazard, on or about 04/09/2015.  For the purpose of this inspection, this employer was determined to be the controlling and correcting employer on the job site. The employer is being cited under OSHAs multi-employer workplace policy.   *Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e):
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a) Third Floor Balcony - An employee observed standing on an unguarded balcony was exposed to a 35 ft. fall hazard, on or about 04/09/2015.   For the purpose of this inspection, this employer was determined to be the controlling and correcting employer on the job site. The employer is being cited under OSHAs multi-employer workplace policy.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340529502.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.