Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MARO DISPLAY, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MARO DISPLAY, INC. in 112 DILLABUR AVENUE, NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI 02852 (NAICS 337122). OSHA activity number 340533801.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Maro Display, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Maro Display, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARO DISPLAY, INC.
Site address
112 DILLABUR AVENUE
City
NORTH KINGSTOWN
State
RI
ZIP
02852
Mailing
112 DILLABUR AVENUE, NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI 02852
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337122
Employees
51
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2015
Abate by
Aug 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:  Establishment: On, or about, 04/09/2015 employees performing repairs to the service elevator gates were exposed to a fall of approximately forty-five feet whereby they were not protected by the use of a standard railing or equivalent fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.132 D01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2015
Abate by
Aug 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment:  Establishment: On, or about, 04/09/2015 the employer did not perform a hazards assessment for the task of reinstalling the service elevator gates onto the guide rails whereby employees were exposed to a fall of approximately forty-five feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2015
Abate by
Sep 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy:    Establishment: On, or about, 02/18/2015 energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy during maintenance and servicing of the Hyundai and Clark counterbalance fork trucks which did not have specific procedures developed whereby maintenance and servicing tasks are performed by the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.178 A05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2015
Abate by
Sep 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered:     Establishment: On, or about, 04/09/2015 employees were operating the counterbalance forklifts using extended fork attachments whereby the employer did not have a data plate to reflect the adjusted capacity.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2975

View Maro Display, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340533801.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.