Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SEALY CONCRETE, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SEALY CONCRETE, INC. in 4460 N.E. I-10 FRONTAGE ROAD, SEALY, TX 77474 (NAICS 327320). OSHA activity number 340551605.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sealy Concrete, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sealy Concrete, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4460 N.E. I-10 FRONTAGE ROAD
City
SEALY
State
TX
ZIP
77474
Mailing
4460 N.E. I-10 FRONTAGE ROAD, SEALY, TX 77474
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327320
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.   On or about 13 April 2015, the rotating chuck on the Crafts Man drill press was not guarded exposing employees to hazards such as those created by being caught in between the point of operation and the material.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth of an inch.  On or about 13 April 2015, the Dewalt abrasive grinder used in the maintenance shop had a distance of ~1 inch between the work rest and its abrasive wheel exposing employees to the hazard of being caught in the rotating wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch.  On or about 13 April 2015, the Dewalt abrasive grinder used in the maintenance shop had a distance of ~1inch between its abrasive wheel and the adjustable tongue guard exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one-half hour:    On or about 13 April 2015 two oxygen cylinders and two acetylene cylinders were stored together without a 20 foot separation or a fire resistant barrier, exposing employees working nearby to an explosion hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.253 B02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(2)(ii): Assigned storage spaces for cylinders were not located where cylinders would not be knocked over or damaged by passing or falling objects, or subject to tampering by unauthorized persons.  On or about 13 April 2015, two oxygen and two acetylene cylinders were stored next to a roll up door in the maintenance shop without being secured, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by a falling or projectile cylinder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B07 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iv): There were damaged parts that may adversely affect safe operation or mechanical strength of electric equipment.  On or about 13 April 2015, an electrical socket located in the break room was damaged, live, and had not been repaired by the employer, exposing employees to electrical hazards of ~120V.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled equipment was not installed or used in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling.  On or about 13 April 2015, flexible cords (Relocatable Power Taps) were used as permanent wiring exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 J02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(2)(iv): A receptacle installed in a wet or damp location was not suitable for the location.  On or about 14 April 2015 the employer did not ensure that the electrical socket located next to the wash sink in the maintenance shop contained a GFCI, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.40 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Aug 7, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative copies of requested records kept under Part 1904 within four (4) business hours.   On or about 13 April 2015, the employer failed to provide copies of OSHA Forms 300 and 300-A or their equivalents, which were requested for calendar years 2012, 2013, and 2014.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $240
  • — Z (O) $400

View Sealy Concrete, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340551605.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.