Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: IOS INSPECTION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of IOS INSPECTION in 2600 E. I-20, MIDLAND, TX 79703 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 340552496.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch IOS Inspection — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for IOS Inspection is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
IOS INSPECTION
Site address
2600 E. I-20
City
MIDLAND
State
TX
ZIP
79703
Mailing
652 N. SAM HOUSTON PKWY E. SUITE 250, HOUSTON, TX 77060
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
Employees
588
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1096 D01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2015
Abate by
Oct 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(1): The employer did not make such surveys as necessary to evaluate the radiation hazards incident to the production, use, release, disposal or presence of radioactive materials or other sources of radiation under a specific set of conditions:  On or about 22 April 2015 employees were exposed to ionizing radiation exposure hazards when the employer failed to conduct surveys of  the primary worksite and the clients worksite periodically to ensure that Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM) materials were not present at the work place or had been inadvertently allowed into the work place to minimize or eliminate the hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.1200 F06 II

Other-than-serious 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2015
Abate by
Oct 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.       On or about 22 April 2015 employees were exposed to chemical exposure hazards when the employer failed to ensure that chemicals at the worksite were properly labeled to prevent accidental exposure or unintentional misuse.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.1200 G08

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2015
Abate by
Oct 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s)     On or about 22 April 2015 employees were exposed to chemical exposure hazards and injury when the employer failed to maintain proper and accessible MSDS/SDS materials for employees working with chemical hazards. The employer also failed to ensure that all chemical substances that were on the worksite and accessible to employees had adequate MSDS/SDS materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6000

1910.1200 H01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2015
Abate by
Oct 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about 22 April 2015 employees were exposed to chemical exposure hazards when the employer failed to train employees on all chemical hazards present at the worksite.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.1200 H03 IV

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2015
Abate by
Oct 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:   On or about 22 April 2015 employees were exposed to  chemical exposure hazards when the employer failed to conduct GHS training by the federally mandated date of 1 December 2013 for all employees working at the  primary worksite
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $1000

View IOS Inspection's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340552496.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.