BELLE CHASSE, LA ·
OSHA Inspection: SCOTT ARMATURE, L.L.C.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SCOTT ARMATURE, L.L.C. in 2805 ENGINEERS ROAD, BELLE CHASSE, LA 70037 (NAICS 335312). OSHA activity number 340561356.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SCOTT ARMATURE, L.L.C.
- Site address
- 2805 ENGINEERS ROAD
- City
- BELLE CHASSE
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70037
- Mailing
- 2805 ENGINEERS ROAD, BELLE CHASSE, LA 70037
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 335312
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $3,150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being struck by a falling load from an Shaw Box Traveling Bridge Crane. On or about 4/15/15, at the main repair shop, the Shaw Box Traveling Bridge Crane was missing a safety latch on the hook. This condition exposed employees to possible struck-by hazards from a falling load.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3150
- · Z (S) $4500
1910.136 A
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards. On or about 4/15/15, in the repair shop, the CSHO observed an employee wearing unprotected, non-steel-toed footwear that did not comply with ASTM F-2412-2005, "Standard Test Methods for Foot Protection," and ASTM F-2413-2005, "Standard Specification for Performance Requirements for Protective Footwear'. There was multiple sources of potential struck-by or roll-off hazards to the feet from heavy tools and equipment parts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2520
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $3,150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. On or about 4/15/15, at the back portion of the repair shop, the following horizontal lathes did not have a chuck guard installed: a) Nardini Horizontal Lathe Model 1560E b) Kingston Horizontal Lathe Serial # 5580
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3150
- · Z (S) $4500
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information. On or about 4/15/15, at the site-wide facility, the employer had failed to provide employee training in accordance with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals. The newly revised safety data sheet and labeling format changes had not been established in the employee training.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 335312)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340561356.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.