Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: SIMON CARGUANA

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SIMON CARGUANA in 100 OAK ST, CLINTON, MA 01510 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340562685.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Simon Carguana for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Simon Carguana is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SIMON CARGUANA
Site address
100 OAK ST
City
CLINTON
State
MA
ZIP
01510
Mailing
32 WATER ST #2, MILFORD, MA 01757
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2015
Abate by
Sep 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not  submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  As of September 1, 2015, the employer did not submit to the Agency the required abatement certification documentation for violation 1, item 1, contained in inspection 1056268, issued on 6/2/2015 with a final order date of 6/29/2015.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $400

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2015
Abate by
Sep 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA (the Agency), within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that each cited violation has been abated:  As of September 1, 2015, the employer had not certified OSHA that the abatement was completed for violation 1, item 2, contained in inspection 1056268, issued on 6/2/2015 with a final order date of 6/29/2015.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $400

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2015
Abate by
Jun 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  100 Oak St., Clinton, MA: On or about April 16, 2015, several employees were roofing this residence more than 20 feet above the ground below without fall protection.   Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $2800
  • · C (S) $2800
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2015
Abate by
Jun 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface:  100 Oak St., Clinton, MA: On or about April 16, 2015, several employees were accessing their roof top work location  at this residence using an aluminum extension ladder that did not extend any distance past the upper landing surface.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $2000
  • · C (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340562685.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.