KEMAH, TX —
OSHA Inspection: RODOLFO JIMENEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RODOLFO JIMENEZ in 207 BLUE POINT, KEMAH, TX 77565 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340571918.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RODOLFO JIMENEZ
- Site address
- 207 BLUE POINT
- City
- KEMAH
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77565
- Mailing
- 11119 SAGEHEATHER DRIVE, HOUSTON, TX 77089
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: a) At the work site, a pump jack scaffold was not inspected prior to use by a competent person in that the designated competent person did not know that the vertical poles were required to be secured to the structure at the top and bottom; that fall protection was required to be provided in the form of either a full guardrail system or fall arrest system; and that any bracket, braces, or accessories were required to be fabricated from metal plates and angles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration: a) At the site, on the north side, a pump jack scaffold was erected without the oversight of a competent person in that the competent person overseeing the erection of the scaffold did not know that the vertical poles were required to be secured to the structure at the top and bottom; that fall protection was required to be provided in the form of either a full guardrail system or fall arrest system; and that any bracket, braces, or accessories were required to be fabricated from metal plates and angles. b) At the site, on the south side, a pump jack scaffold was erected without the oversight of a competent person in that the competent person overseeing the erection of the scaffold did not know that the vertical poles were required to be secured to the structure at the top and bottom; that fall protection was required to be provided in the form of either a full guardrail system or fall arrest system; and that any bracket, braces, or accessories were required to be fabricated from metal plates and angles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a) At the work site, an employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 18 feet while performing siding work without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: a) At the site, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 16 feet when installing siding from a pump jack scaffold which was not equipped with a complete guardrail system including an intermediate railing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary: a) At the north end of the work site, employees were exposed to falls of 16 feet and greater and struck-by hazards from falling pump jack scaffold components when performing siding work from a pump jack scaffold that was not secured to the bottom of the structure at post 1 of 3. b) At the north end of the work site, employees were exposed to falls of 16 feet and greater and struck-by hazards from falling pump jack scaffold components when performing siding work from a pump jack scaffold that was not secured to the bottom of the structure at post 2 of 3. c) At the north end of the work site, employees were exposed to falls of 16 feet and greater and struck-by hazards from falling pump jack scaffold components when performing siding work from a pump jack scaffold that was not secured to the bottom of the structure at post 3 of 3.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340571918.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.