NORTH HAVEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: WHITE PINE FRAMING LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WHITE PINE FRAMING LLC in 520 WASHINGTON AVENUE BLDG #2, NORTH HAVEN, CT 06473 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340573336.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WHITE PINE FRAMING LLC
- Site address
- 520 WASHINGTON AVENUE BLDG #2
- City
- NORTH HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06473
- Mailing
- 590 FORBES AVENUE, NEW HAVEN, CT 06512
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- May 11, 2015
- Abate by
- May 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. Jobsite: The employer did not ensure through providing appropriate training/information and performance evaluation that the operator of the all-terrain forklift (PIT) was operating the PIT safely at all times.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $840
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 11, 2015
- Abate by
- May 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: The employees who were performing residential construction activities on the roof were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.502 D09
- Issued
- May 11, 2015
- Abate by
- May 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(9): Lanyards and/or vertical lifelines did not have a minimum breaking strength of 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN): Jobsite: The lanyard of the Self-retracting full body harness, which was worn by an employee as a personal fall arrest device was attached to the top rail of the work platform with a nylon web sling and did not have a minimum breaking strength of 5000 pounds.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.502 D23
- Issued
- May 11, 2015
- Abate by
- May 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(23): Personal fall arrest systems were attached to guardrail systems or to hoists: Jobsite: The lanyard of the Self-retracting full body harness which was worn by an employee as a personal fall arrest device was attached to the top rail of the work platform with a nylon web sling.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- May 11, 2015
- Abate by
- May 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees who were exposed fall hazards while working on the roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1120
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections at White Pine Framing LLC
View White Pine Framing LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340573336.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.