Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NOE PUENTES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NOE PUENTES in 1001 MATLOCK, MANSFIELD, TX 76063 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340576669.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch NOE Puentes — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for NOE Puentes is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NOE PUENTES
Site address
1001 MATLOCK
City
MANSFIELD
State
TX
ZIP
76063
Mailing
1805 SPRING AVE, CARROLLTON, TX 75006
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2015
Abate by
Jul 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   At the construction site, employees working on the ground were not wearing head protection and exposed to head injuries from falling decking material.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2015
Abate by
Jul 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.   At the construction site, employees installing decking on the roof were not protected from falling approximately 12 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2015
Abate by
Jul 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:   At the construction site, employees used a portable extension ladder to access the roof area and the side rails did not extend at least three feet above the landing exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

View NOE Puentes's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340576669.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.