Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J.D. EDWARD ROOFING & SIDING

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J.D. EDWARD ROOFING & SIDING in 3300 DEWITT, MATTOON, IL 61938 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340577634.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J.D. Edward Roofing & Siding — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J.D. Edward Roofing & Siding is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3300 DEWITT
City
MATTOON
State
IL
ZIP
61938
Mailing
716 NORTH 24TH, MATTOON, IL 61938
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2015
Abate by
Sep 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment was not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury:      Employees were operating a pneumatic nail gun and did not have safety glasses on while operating the pneumatic nail gun.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $300
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2015
Abate by
Sep 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provide an alternative fall protection measure:         Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet while installing shingles and a suitable fall protection system was not used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $700
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340577634.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.