WESTWOOD, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: FAUSTINI CONTRACTING CORP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FAUSTINI CONTRACTING CORP in 22 KINDERKAMACK ROAD, WESTWOOD, NJ 07675 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340580513.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FAUSTINI CONTRACTING CORP
- Site address
- 22 KINDERKAMACK ROAD
- City
- WESTWOOD
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07675
- Mailing
- 193 BIRCH ROAD, FRANKLIN LAKES, NJ 07417
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: a- Aerial Lift: Employees positioned beneath workers at the unprotected roof edge were exposed to overhead impact hazards as head protection was not utilized. Condition noted on or about 04/18/2015.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated a-Aerial Lift: Employees were engaged in framing work from an aerial lift in which a personal fall arrest system was not utilized exposing employees to fall hazards of approximately 15ft to the concrete below. Condition noted on or about 04/18/2015
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. a- Unprotected Roof Edge: Employees engaged in framing work were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 20ft to the concrete below as a means of fall protection was not utilized. Condition noted on or about 04/18/2015
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Faustini Contracting Corp
View Faustini Contracting Corp's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340580513.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.