Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ISIDRO CORDOBA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ISIDRO CORDOBA in 1028 TREELINE WAY, DELAWARE, OH 43015 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340583798.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Isidro Cordoba — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Isidro Cordoba is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ISIDRO CORDOBA
Site address
1028 TREELINE WAY
City
DELAWARE
State
OH
ZIP
43015
Mailing
331 HILER ROAD, COLUMBUS, OH 43228
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2015
Abate by
Oct 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within ten calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  a.  The employer has failed to submit abatement certification within ten days of the abatement date, July 16, 2015, for a violation of 29 CFR 1926.100(a) issued as citation 1, item 1, and described as follows:       At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided and used hard hat protection when working below employees working above their head, thereby exposing employees to a potential struck-by hazard.  b.  The employer has failed to submit abatement certification within ten days of the abatement date, July 16, 2015, for a violation of 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) issued as citation 1, item 2, and described as follows:    At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided and used eye protection when using power actuated nail gun, thereby exposing employees to a potential struck-by hazard.  c.  The employer has failed to submit abatement certification within ten days of the abatement date, July 30, 2015, for a violation of 29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3) issued as citation 1, item 3, and described as follows:    At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees had a clear understanding on the requirements to use fall protection when working at heights greater than six feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2015
Abate by
Oct 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  a.  The employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, March 13, 2015, for a violation of 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), issued as citation 2, item 1, and described as follows:      At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided and used some means of fall protection when performing framing work, from the outer top plate, at heights greater than six feet, thereby exposing employees to an approximate ten foot fall hazard.   Isidro Cordoba was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 875903, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as final order on March 27, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at 29 Avaleen Circle North, Powell, Ohio 43065.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2015
Abate by
Jul 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.     a)     At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided and used hard hat protection when working below employees working above their head, thereby exposing employees to a potential struck-by hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2015
Abate by
Jul 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.     a)     At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided and used eye protection when using power actuated nail gun, thereby exposing employees to a potential struck-by hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.503 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2015
Abate by
Jul 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.503(c): "Retraining." When the employer has reason to believe that any affected employee who has already been trained does not have the understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section, the employer shall retrain each such employee. Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where:  29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): Inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill.     a)    At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees had a clear understanding on the requirements to use fall protection when working at heights greater than six feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2015
Abate by
Jul 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,800 · Current $4,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.     a)    At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided and used some means of fall protection when performing framing work, from the outer top plate, at heights greater than six feet, thereby exposing employees to an approximate 10 foot fall hazard.    Isidro Cordoba was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number_875903_, citation number_1_, item number_2_ and was affirmed as a final order on March 27, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at 29 Avaleen Circle North, Powell, Oh 43065.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $4800

View Isidro Cordoba's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340583798.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.