AMARILLO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: CRAIG BUILDING SYSTEMS
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CRAIG BUILDING SYSTEMS in 6001 W MCCORMICK RD,, AMARILLO, TX 79118 (NAICS 321214). OSHA activity number 340585934.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CRAIG BUILDING SYSTEMS
- Site address
- 6001 W MCCORMICK RD,
- City
- AMARILLO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79118
- Mailing
- 6001 W MCCORMICK RD,, AMARILLO, TX 79118
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321214
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly and in a sanitary condition: On or about April 22, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that all places of employment in work shop were free from hazardous build up of combustible wood dust exposing employees to fire and explosion hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.22 D01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate: On or about April 22, 2015, employees were exposed to struck by hazards in that the employer did not ensure that a load limit was posted on platforms used for storage above the office.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.23 A01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that every stairway floor opening were guarded by a standard railing constructed in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section. The railing shall be provided on all exposed sides (except at entrance to stairway): On or about April 22, 2015, on the south end of shop, next to the office, stairs leading to the overhead storage area were not provided with standard hand rails, exposing employees to a fall hazard of more than four (4) feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floor(s) and/or platform(s) four (4) feet or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent) and toeboards: On or about April 22, 2015, the employer did not ensure a platform located at the southwest end of the shop, which was more than four (4) feet above the lower level was guarded on all open sides. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.303 F
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(f): Employer did not ensure that all breakers/Switches in an electrical circuit breaker panel were identified as to their purpose: On or about April 22, 2015, the employer did not ensure that the 200 amp 120/240 volt electrical panel box was labeled to indicate what equipment each breaker supplied power to and exposed employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.305 B03 II
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(3)(ii): ): Pull and junction boxes used on systems rated over 600 volts, nominal, were not closed by suitable covers, securely fastened in place: On April 22, 2015, the employer did not ensure that a junction box was closed with a cover on the south wall of the shop. Exposing employees to electrical shock and burns hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer had not developed, implemented, and or maintained at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria in 29 CFR 1910.1200 (f), (g), and (h) will be met: On April 22, 2015, the employer had not developed a written hazardous communication program. The employees were exposed to explosion, deflagration or fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Craig Building Systems
View Craig Building Systems's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321214)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340585934.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.