BEAUFORT, SC —
OSHA Inspection: SCWC ENTERPRISES, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SCWC ENTERPRISES, INC. in DOUGLAS DRIVE, BLDG. 1040 MCAS, BEAUFORT, SC 29904 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 340589605.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SCWC ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Site address
- DOUGLAS DRIVE, BLDG. 1040 MCAS
- City
- BEAUFORT
- State
- SC
- ZIP
- 29904
- Mailing
- 1330 QUACCO ROAD, POOLER, GA 31322
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jul 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103) (a) The employer had not fully implemented their written respiratory protection program for an employee who was required to wear a disposable filtering facepiece respirator while cutting contraction joints in concrete, in that respiratory hazards were not evaluated and a respirator medical evaluation was not provided. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $600
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Jul 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace, including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: (a) The employer did not conduct personal air monitoring to assess employee exposure to respirable dust containing silica generated during the cutting of contraction joints in concrete. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jul 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103) (a) An employee who was required to wear respiratory protection while cutting contraction joints in partially cured concrete was not provided with a medical evaluation. (Note: Medical evaluations may be discontinued when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.) ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.51 F01
- Issued
- Jul 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.51(f)(1): The employer did not provide adequate washing facilities for employees engaged in the application of paints, coatings, herbicides, or insecticides, or in other operations where contaminants may be harmful to the employees. Such facilities were not in near proximity to the worksite and was not equipped as to enable employees to remove such substances: (a) Employees whose skin surfaces were exposed to concrete containing Portland cement during the pouring and finishing of concrete, were not provided with soap and towels in conjunction with a water spigot to effectively remove the material. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Jul 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: (a) As of April 21, 2015, the employer had not trained employees on the new chemical container label elements and the new format and types of information on each section of safety data sheets (SDSs). Employees were potentially exposed to such hazardous chemicals as silica and concrete, containing Portland cement. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Scwc Enterprises, INC.
View Scwc Enterprises, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in SC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340589605.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.