Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SCWC ENTERPRISES, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SCWC ENTERPRISES, INC. in DOUGLAS DRIVE, BLDG. 1040 MCAS, BEAUFORT, SC 29904 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 340589605.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Scwc Enterprises, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Scwc Enterprises, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
DOUGLAS DRIVE, BLDG. 1040 MCAS
City
BEAUFORT
State
SC
ZIP
29904
Mailing
1330 QUACCO ROAD, POOLER, GA 31322
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103)    (a) The employer had not fully implemented their written respiratory protection program for an employee who was required to wear a disposable filtering facepiece respirator while cutting contraction joints in concrete, in that respiratory hazards were not evaluated and a respirator medical evaluation was not provided.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii):     The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace, including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:    (a) The employer did not conduct personal air monitoring to assess employee exposure to respirable dust containing silica generated during the cutting of contraction joints in concrete.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103)    (a) An employee who was required to wear respiratory protection while cutting contraction joints in partially cured concrete was not provided with a medical evaluation. (Note: Medical evaluations may be discontinued when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.)    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.51 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2015
Abate by
Aug 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.51(f)(1): The employer did not provide adequate washing facilities for employees engaged in the application of paints, coatings, herbicides, or insecticides, or in other operations where contaminants may be harmful to the employees.  Such facilities were not in near proximity to the worksite and was not equipped as to enable employees to remove such substances:    (a)  Employees whose skin surfaces were exposed to concrete containing Portland cement during the pouring and finishing of concrete, were not provided with soap and towels in conjunction with a water spigot to effectively remove the material.     ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2015
Abate by
Aug 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:      (a) As of April 21, 2015, the employer had not trained employees on the new chemical container label elements and the new format and types of information on each section of safety data sheets (SDSs). Employees were potentially exposed to such hazardous chemicals as silica and concrete, containing Portland cement.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Scwc Enterprises, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340589605.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.