Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COOKE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COOKE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING, INC. in 803 GULF WIND LANE, SARITA, TX 78385 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 340595834.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cooke Electrical Contracting, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cooke Electrical Contracting, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
803 GULF WIND LANE
City
SARITA
State
TX
ZIP
78385
Mailing
100 N FOREST ST, AMARILLO, TX 79106
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238210
Employees
70
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C07 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2015
Abate by
Oct 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolated:       At this establishment, at Gulf Wind Site, employees (maintenance/wind technicians) were exposed to electrical, mechanical, stored, hydraulic, and kinetic energies, when performing maintenance on wind towers equipment and machineries. The employer did not train his employees in using the company's specific procedures for lock-out/tag-out for each equipment or machinery and in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolated. Maintenance crew employees had not implemented and used the company's specific procedures for lock-out/tag-out for each equipment or machinery such as, but not limited to the following:     a) Wind Tower Bottom Electrical Breakers Control Panel (Breakers - F2, F5, Q9 and Local Switch);    b) Wind Turbine G.O. Hydraulic Station Rotor (Pressure Shut Off/Isolation - Ball Valve V-101 and the blades);    c) Wind Tower Gear Box (high speed pin);    d) Converter Module Cabinet;    e) Mitsubishi Wind Turbine Generator - MWT62/1.0 (low speed locking pin) and the Capacitors;    f) Yaw System;    g) Wind Tower Top Electrical Breakers Control Panel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2015
Abate by
Oct 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      At this establishment, at Gulf Wind Site, and times prior thereto, the employer failed to develop, implement, and /or maintain at the work site a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h). During the inspection and through employees interview, the CSHO observed that the employer did not have and maintain all SDS available to the employees; and the employer was not providing to all employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, when working with hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to:    1. Resin Solution (mixture of isomers - Styrene, Xylene, Methacrylic Acid);    2. Synthetic wind turbine gear oil (MOBILGEAR SHC XMP 320);    3. Hydraulic oil (MOBIL UNIVIS N32);    4. Universal Metallic Spray/Aerosol paint (Rust-oleum);    5. Industrial cleaner and degreaser (Simple Green).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $4200
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.157 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2015
Abate by
Oct 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:(a)    At this establishment, at Gulf Wind Site, and times prior thereto, the employer did not provide an educational program (training) for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting. During the inspection and through employees interview, the CSHO observed that the employer policy (Employee Safety and Health Handbook) was stand for fighting incipient stage fire fighting by using the fire extinguishers, but the employees never received any training on how to use them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340595834.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.