Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE, INDIANAPOLIS, IN

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE, INDIANAPOLIS, IN in MCFARLING FOODS 333 WEST 14TH STREET, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46202 (NAICS 926140). OSHA activity number 340601558.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Indianapolis, in — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Indianapolis, in is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
MCFARLING FOODS 333 WEST 14TH STREET
City
INDIANAPOLIS
State
IN
ZIP
46202
Mailing
MCFARLING FOODS 333 WEST 14TH STREET, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46202
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
926140
Employees
3
Ownership type
D

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 B01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2015
Abate by
Aug 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(b)(1): Aisles and passageways were not kept clear and in good repair, with no obstruction across or in aisles that could create a hazard:  (a) On or about May 14, 2015 in the chicken processing room, in the grinding room and at the entry door to the refrigerated areas, electrical cable had been ran at heights which created a tripping hazard or obstruction.  The employees were exposed to electrical hazards that could cause burns, shocks or death if the line is pulled from the equipment end, and trip hazards that could cause bruises and contusions.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.176 B

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2015
Abate by
Aug 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Storage was not secure. Storage of material shall not create a hazard. Bags, containers, bundles, etc., stored in tiers shall be stacked, blocked, interlocked and limited in height so that they are stable and secure against sliding or collapse:  (a)  On or about May 14, 2015 in the dry, refrigerated, and freezer storage areas, the boxes were found to be stacked haphazardly on racks.  An empty pallet had fallen from a higher level and was stopped by the storage below it, and a rack holding a pallet was not level and tipped forward due to the rack having been damaged.  USDA employees were exposed to being struck by overhead objects when inspecting these areas for vermin and proper storage.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2015
Abate by
Aug 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:  (a) On or about May 14, 2015 in the chicken room and the red meat room at the scales, the employer was using Kensington and Tripp Lite surge protectors in an industrial setting and in a wet or damp area.  This usage is not allowed under the list UL 1449.  Employees were exposed to possible electric shock and burns.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2015
Abate by
Aug 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(6): Equipment located in damp or wet locations was not identified for that purpose:  (a) On or about May 15, 2015 in the chicken and red meat processing rooms at the scale and computer area, the Tripp Lite and Kensington surge protectors were being used in damp and wet locations.  The surge protectors were not designed for use in a damp or wet location.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B07

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2015
Abate by
Aug 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7):  Electrical equipment was not installed in a neat and workmanlike manner:  (a) On or about May 14, 2015 in the chicken processing room, in the grinding room and at the entry door to the refrigerated areas, electrical cable had been ran at heights which created a tripping hazard or obstruction.  The employees were exposed to electrical hazards that could cause burns, shocks or death.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B07 IV

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2015
Abate by
Aug 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iv): There were damaged parts that may adversely affect safe operation or mechanical strength of the equipment, such as parts that are broken, bent, cut, or deteriorated by corrosion, chemical action or overheating:   (a)  On or about May 14, 2015 in the red meat processing room at the scale, the Kensington surge protector used on the computer/scales for red meat had the side broken out, exposing the interior electrical wiring.  Employees were exposed potential electrical shock and burns.    (b)  On or about May 14, 2014 in the freeze tunnel room, the electrical junction receptacle on top of the freeze tunnel had corroded and wiring was exposed.  Employees were exposed to potential electrical shocks and burns.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:  (a)  On or about May 14, 2015, a written personal protective hazard assessment had not been performed by the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2015
Abate by
Aug 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  (a) On or about May 15, 2015 in red meat processing area, the USDA employees were required to inspect the Smart Slice Vision Red Meat Multi-cut machine.  The employer did not have a procedure to control the electrical, hydraulic, and chemical energy present in the machine.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340601558.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.