Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NAGY'S COLLISION SPECIALISTS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NAGY'S COLLISION SPECIALISTS in 976 BROAD STREET, WADSWORTH, OH 44281 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 340606482.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nagy'S Collision Specialists — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nagy'S Collision Specialists is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
976 BROAD STREET
City
WADSWORTH
State
OH
ZIP
44281
Mailing
976 BROAD STREET, WADSWORTH, OH 44281
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 C06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2015
Abate by
Aug 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6): Electrical wiring and equipment not subject to deposits of combustible residues but located in a spraying area as herein defined were not explosion-proof type approved for Class I, group D locations and did not otherwise conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part, for Class I, Division 1, Hazardous Locations:  On or about May 4, 2015, the employer exposed employees to injuries from explosion and fire hazards; the lighting in the two (2) spray booths is not rated for use in paint booth operations. Paint booths should have class 1 electrical; both paint booths have lighting that is only UL rated for damp conditions, not explosive conditions. In the upper-deck spray booth two (2) light fixtures are not rated for use in class 1 conditions. In the lower-deck spray booth, the ligthing along both sides of the booth is not rated for class 1 conditions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about May 4, 2015, the employer failed to conduct medical evaluations on employees required to wear respirators, such as, but not limited to, the employees who work in the paint/spray booths at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1470
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2015
Abate by
Aug 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested:  On or about May 4, 2015, the employer failed to conduct annual fit testing of employees who are required to wear tight-fitting respirators, including but not limited to, the employees who operate the spray/paint booth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2015
Abate by
Aug 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1): Respirators were not cleaned and disinfected using the procedures in Appendix B-2 of 29 CFR 1910.134 or equivalent procedures recommended by the respirator manufacturer:  On or about May 4, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that respirators were effectively cleaned. Employees use compressed air to clean off their respirators, which could damage the respirator, and in turn not adequately protect employees from the hazardous conditions for which it is designed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2015
Abate by
Aug 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:  On or about May 4, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that respirators were properly stored to prevent damage. Employees store respirators in their tool boxes which could damage or deform the respirator, and in turn not adequately protect employees from the hazardous conditions for which it is designed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2015
Abate by
Jul 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:  On or about May 4, 2015, the employer failed to provide portable fire extinguisher training.   Note the employer may exercise one of the following options:   1. Provide portable fire extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), meet the distribution requirements per 29 CFR 1910.157(d) (75 to the nearest extinguisher for Class A fires and 50 to the nearest unit for Class B fires), and provide training and education for all employees in the use of such equipment and the hazards associated with incipient stage fire fighting as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(g).  The other sections of 29 CFR also apply.   2. Provide extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), designate certain employees to be the only employees authorized to use such equipment and require all other employees to immediately evacuate upon the sound of the fire alarm, establish this in writing in an emergency action plan as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and train/educate designated employees per 1910.157(g).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from distribution requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(d).   3. Establish a written fire safety policy which requires the immediate and total evacuation of employees from the workplace upon the sounding of a fire alarm signal.  This policy shall include an emergency action plan and a fire prevention plan as specified in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and 29 CFR 1910.39(a).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157 to include the need for providing portable fire equipment unless a specific standard requires that a portable fire extinguisher be provided (such as those requirements in 29 CFR 1910.106/107 related to the use/storage of flammable/combustible liquids).  If extinguishers are provided, but not intended for employee use, 29 CFR 1910.157(e) and (f) are still applicable (inspection, maintenance, and testing of equipment).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2015
Abate by
Jul 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment was not used when compressed air was used for cleaning purposes:  On or about June 18, 2015, the employer failed to protect employees from struck-by hazards by alllowing employees to use compressed air to clean themselves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2015
Abate by
Jul 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  On or about May 4, 2015, the employer failed to provide the information contained in Appendix D of the Respirator Standard to employees who were allowed to voluntarily wear dust masks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340606482.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.