Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: MARIO ANTONIO ROBLEDO-GODINEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARIO ANTONIO ROBLEDO-GODINEZ in 2665 PINE BLOOM DRIVE, ROSWELL, GA 30076 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340607175.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mario Antonio Robledo-Godinez for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mario Antonio Robledo-Godinez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2665 PINE BLOOM DRIVE
City
ROSWELL
State
GA
ZIP
30076
Mailing
2020 OLD CONCORD DRIVE, SE, COVINGTON, GA 30016
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  (a) Roof, residential home located at 2665 Pine Bloom Drive, Roswell, GA 30076: Employees operating Hitachi (Model NV45AB2) Coil Roofing Nail Guns at 105 PSI were not provided with protective eyewear. Employees operating these tools failed to wear safety glasses and goggles.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   (a) Upper roof, residential construction located at 2665 Pine Bloom Drive, Roswell, GA 30076: Employees were exposed to falls of approximately 20-feet while engaged in roofing activities on a 7/12 pitched roof with no fall protection system in place.   (b) Lower roof, residential construction located at 2665 Pine Bloom Drive, Roswell, GA 30076: Employees were exposed to falls of approximately 9-feet, 1-inch while engaged in roofing activities on a 4/12 pitched roof with no fall protection system in place.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.552 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.552(a)(1): The employer did not comply with the manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators.                                                                   (a) Front side, residential home located at 2665 Pine Bloom Drive, Roswell, GA 30076: Employer allowed employees to use the TranzSporter (Model LH200) Platform Hoist as a ladder to access the roof. Manufacturer's general safety instructions state that this hoist should never be used as a ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  (a) Front side, residential home located at 2665 Pine Bloom Drive, Roswell, GA 30076: The ladder provided was not secured to the structure and did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface of the roof to allow for safe access on and off the roof. Employees accessing this ladder were exposed to falls of approximately 9 feet, 1-inch to the lower level.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340607175.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.