Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DAVID LOPEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAVID LOPEZ in 3336 VALLEY FORGE, ABILENE, TX 79601 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 340607670.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch David Lopez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for David Lopez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DAVID LOPEZ
Site address
3336 VALLEY FORGE
City
ABILENE
State
TX
ZIP
79601
Mailing
1718 S 12TH ST, ABILENE, TX 79602
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, were not protected by protective helmets:       On or about May 5, 2015, employees were exposed to struck by hazards in that the employer did not insure the use of protective headwear.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents.   On or about May 5, 2015, employees were exposed to struck by hazards in that the employer did not ensure use of safety glasses by employees cutting bricks during brick laying operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.416 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:        On or about May 5, 2015, employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards in that the employer failed to ensure the use of non damaged power cords to the circular saw.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:    On or about April 23, 2015, employees were exposed to caught in and struck by hazards in that the employer did not properly erect the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports such that the space between adjacent units, and the space between the platforms:  On or about April 23, 2015, employees were exposed to fall  hazards in that the employer failed to ensure the scaffolding was fully decked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary.   On or about May 5, 2015, employees were exposed to struck buy hazards in that the employer failed to ensure that the space in between the planks was no more than one inch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B10

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(10): Scaffold components manufactured by different manufacturers were modified in order to intermix them and a competent person did not determine that the resulting scaffold was structurally sound:    On or about May 5, 2015, the employer did not ensure that the same manufactured scaffold was used throughout the assembly and erection of scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:   On or about May 5, 2015, employees were exposed to caught in and fall hazards in that the employer failed to use base plates and mud sills for the erected scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(3): Supported scaffold poles, legs, post, frames, and/or uprights were not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement.  On or about May 5, 2015, employee were exposed to fall hazards in that the employer failed to ensure that the scaffold was plumb and square.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.      On or about May 5, 2015, employees were exposed to fall hazards in that the employer failed to ensure that employees had a ladder or other means of access to ascend and descend the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  On  or about May 5, 2015, employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of ten feet in that the employer failed to have and ensure the use of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall.    On or about May 5, 2015, employees were exposed to struck by hazards in that the employer failed to ensure the installation of  toeboards, screens, or through the erection of debris nets, that contain or deflect falling objects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View David Lopez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340607670.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.