HOOKSETT, NH ·
OSHA Inspection: DAVID SCHLOTH
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DAVID SCHLOTH in 135 WEST RIVER ROAD, HOOKSETT, NH 03106 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 340611888.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAVID SCHLOTH
- Site address
- 135 WEST RIVER ROAD
- City
- HOOKSETT
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03106
- Mailing
- 1 DUNVEGAN DRIVE, MERRIMAC, MA 01860
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: Location: site On or about 5/5/15, employees were not protected from overhead hazards while working below framers installing roof trusses.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Location: site On or about 5/5/15, employees were exposed to a 10 foot fall hazard while working on the second floor without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.451 B01 II
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(ii): The platform was not planked or decked as fully as possible and the remaining open space between the platform and the uprights exceeded 9.5 inches (24.1 cm): Location: site On or about 5/5/15, Employees were not protected from falling while working on a scaffold platform that was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340611888.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.