Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MONROE TRUCK EQUIPMENT, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MONROE TRUCK EQUIPMENT, INC. in 812 DRAPER AVE., JOLIET, IL 60432 (NAICS 336211). OSHA activity number 340613272.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Monroe Truck Equipment, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Monroe Truck Equipment, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
812 DRAPER AVE.
City
JOLIET
State
IL
ZIP
60432
Mailing
812 DRAPER AVE., JOLIET, IL 60432
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336211
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.101 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Abate by
Oct 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6:    a.  On or about May 1,  2015,  in the shop area adjacent to vehicle bay, a compressed gas cylinder of argon and oxygen was not secured.     b. On or about May 1, 2015, in the fab shop,  8 compressed gas cylinders of acetylene and other gases were free standing not secured.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Abate by
Oct 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one-half hour:   a.  In the fab shop / repair shop,  approximately 3 compressed gas cylinder of oxygen were not separated from acetylene cylinders a minimum of 20 feet nor a half-hour fire rated barrier.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Abate by
Nov 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:      a.  On or about July 8, 2015, employees that spray paint used supplied air and negative pressure respirators.  The employer did not train employees required to use supplied air and air filtering respirators annually.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck:    a.  On or about July 8, 2015,  in the facility,  employees were required to operate powered industrial trucks,  including a Clark fork lift truck,  during material handling operations.  The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator completed the required evaluation specified in paragraph (l).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.179 B08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(b)(8): Employee(s) other than designated personnel were permitted to operate crane(s):    a. On or about May 1, 2015,  employees were required to use overhead cranes during truck equipment installations.  The employees were not designated and trained on safe crane operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Abate by
Oct 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    a.  On or about May 1, 2015, employees were required to operate an unguarded press brake during installation activities thereby exposing employees to the hazard of amputations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 06890691

29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):    a. In the facility, the employer did not perform an initial exposure determination for hexavalent chromium for employees who are required weld and grind on stainless steel during truck equipment installations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.1026 L02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Abate by
Nov 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(i): 29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(i):  The employer did not provide training and information to ensure that employees could demonstrate knowledge of 29 CFR 1910.1026, and the purpose and a description of the medical surveillance program:    a.  On or about July 8, 2015,  in the facility,  employees were not provided information and training regarding the hazards of hexavalent chromium.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3): The employee training did not include the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i) through (h)(3)(iv):        a.  On or about July 8, 2015, in the facility,  employees are required to use potentially hazardous chemicals during the installation of truck equipment and painting operations.  The chemicals used included but not limited to,  rubberized undercoating,  acetylene,  oxygen,  paint, oils, hexavalent chromium, and spectraclean solvent.  The employer did not provide each employee with the required training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.134 E01

Deleted Repeat 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Abate by
Nov 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a.  On or about July 8, 2015,  in the facility, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation for employee(s) required to wear air purifying negative pressure respirators and supplied-air respirators during spray finishing operations.   The Monroe Truck Equipment, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard (name previously cited standard), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 912278, citation number 1, item number 1b and was affirmed as a final order on July 25, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at 812 Draper Ave., Joliet, IL.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $1000

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  a.  On or about July 8,  2015,  the employer did not provide information in Appendix D to employees voluntarily wearing filtering facepieces and negative pressure respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Monroe Truck Equipment, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340613272.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.