Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FERNANDO COMPO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FERNANDO COMPO in W229 N4435 BRIDGE ST., PEWAUKEE, WI 53072 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 340614908.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fernando Compo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fernando Compo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FERNANDO COMPO
Site address
W229 N4435 BRIDGE ST.
City
PEWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53072
Mailing
5116 23RD AVE., KENOSHA, WI 53140
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2015
Abate by
Jul 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $660 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    (a) The employer did not ensure that an employee was wearing a hard hat when working below another employee who was working on a pump jack scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $660
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2015
Abate by
Jul 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.       (a) The employer did not ensure that employees had a point of access and egress when working from a pump jack scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2015
Abate by
Jul 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary.    (a) The employer did not ensure that the pump jack scaffold poles were secured at the bottom and other points as necessary.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2015
Abate by
Jul 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    (a) The employer did not ensure than an employee was using fall protection when conducting siding work from the roof of a residential building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2015
Abate by
Jul 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    (a) The employer did not ensure that an employee was using fall protection when conducting siding work from a pump jack scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2015
Abate by
Jul 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were trained in recognizing fall hazards and implementing fall protection measures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340614908.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.