Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HANDI-FOIL CORPORATION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of HANDI-FOIL CORPORATION in 2275 W. DIEHL ROAD, NAPERVILLE, IL 60563 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 340615723.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Handi-Foil Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Handi-Foil Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2275 W. DIEHL ROAD
City
NAPERVILLE
State
IL
ZIP
60563
Mailing
2275 W. DIEHL ROAD, NAPERVILLE, IL 60563
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
420
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 11 instances 400 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2015
Abate by
Jan 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.       Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazards created by in-going nip points and rotating parts on the following machines:    a.) Baldor Coil Cart Roller- The "coil roller" that unwinds the aluminum rolls did not have a guard to prevent employees from gaining access to the rotating powered roller. There are approximately 10 coil cart rollers. This exposed employees to a caught-in and crushing hazard.    b.) Core Machine- The employer did not ensure that all rotating parts were guarded to protect the operators while hand-feeding the cardboard material into the machine. This exposed employees to a caught-in hazard.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3250
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.215 A02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2015
Abate by
Nov 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Guard design. The safety guard shall cover the spindle end, nut, and flange projections. The safety guard shall be mounted so as to maintain proper alignment with the wheel, and the strength of the fastenings shall exceed the strength of the guard.    Tool Room: Abrasive wheel(s) used in the maintenance department, was not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle nut on the following machines.     Boyar-Schultz grinding machine S/N 421- The spindle nut was unguarded. This exposed employees to a caught-by hazard.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2600
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.217 C02 I A

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 400 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2015
Abate by
Nov 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(2)(i)(a): Point of operation guard(s) on mechanical power press(es) did not prevent entry of hands or fingers into the point of operation by reaching through, over, under or around the guard(s).    On power press #118, #119, and #120. The employer did not ensure that guarding was installed to prevent employees from gaining entry to the point of operation. This exposed employees to a caught-in and crushing hazard.    Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3250
  • — Z (S) $5000

View Handi-Foil Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340615723.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.