Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NATIONAL FIBER TECHNOLOGY, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NATIONAL FIBER TECHNOLOGY, LLC in 15 UNION STREET, LAWRENCE, MA 01840 (NAICS 313110). OSHA activity number 340617786.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch National Fiber Technology, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for National Fiber Technology, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
15 UNION STREET
City
LAWRENCE
State
MA
ZIP
01840
Mailing
15 UNION STREET, LAWRENCE, MA 01840
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
313110
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2015
Abate by
Aug 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    (a) Location - 15 Union Street, Lawrence, MA:    On or about 5/8/2015, a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training, and periodic inspection has not been developed or implemented to protect employees from hazards while servicing textile machinery.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2015
Abate by
Aug 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    (a) Location - 15 Union Street, Lawrence, MA:    On or about 5/8/2015, the feed rolls of an industrial carding machine were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.219 A03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2015
Abate by
Aug 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(a)(3): The sides and face sections nip points of the drive belt(s) and pulley(s) of textile machinery were not guarded by a guard which extended at least six inches beyond the rim of the pulley on the in-running and off-running sides of the belt and at least two inches away from the rim and face of the pulley in all other directions:    (a) Location - 15 Union Street, Lawrence, MA:    On or about 5/8/2015, the drive belts and pulleys of an industrial carding machine were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2015
Abate by
Aug 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:    (a) Location - 15 Union Street, Lawrence, MA:    On or about 5/8/2015, the projecting shaft ends of the feed rolls of an industrial carding machine were not guarded and projected more than one half of their diameter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2015
Abate by
Aug 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven -7 feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:    (a) Location - 15 Union Street, Lawrence, MA:    On or about 5/8/2015, the sprocket wheels and chains of an industrial carding machine were not enclosed where less than seven feet above the floor.    (b) Location - 15 Union Street, Lawrence, MA:    On or about 5/8/2015, the sprocket wheels and chains of a knitter were not enclosed where less than seven feet above the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2015
Abate by
Aug 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    (a) Location - 15 Union Street, Lawrence, MA:    On or about 5/8/2015, compressed air used to clean fibers from an industrial carding machine was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $700
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.303 G01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2015
Abate by
Jul 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage:(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY EQUIPMENT AND CONDITION(S)) (STATE HAZARD(S) TO EMPLOYEE(S))    (a) Location - 15 Union Street, Lawrence, MA:    On or about 5/8/2015, the working space about electrical installations in the rear of the facility was used for storage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours:    On or about 4/24/2015, a work place incident resulting in the in-patient hospitalization of an employee was not reported to OSHA within twenty-four hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $800
  • — Z (O) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340617786.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.