Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: B & B CRATES

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of B & B CRATES in 103 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, CAMP DOUGLAS, WI 54618 (NAICS 423310). OSHA activity number 340629179.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch B & B Crates — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for B & B Crates is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
B & B CRATES
Site address
103 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
City
CAMP DOUGLAS
State
WI
ZIP
54618
Mailing
P.O. BOX 169, CAMP DOUGLAS, WI 54618
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423310
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:    On or about May 21, 2015, employees were exposed to noise in excess of 85 decibels and an effective hearing conservation program with audiograms or training were not provided.    Abatement certification required per 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2015
Abate by
Sep 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:    The employer had not performed initial air monitoring to determine employee exposure to saw dust on the production floor.    Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.213 B03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(b)(3): Provisions were not made to prevent woodworking machine(s) from automatically restarting upon restoration of power after power failure:    a)    On or about May 12, 2015, the 10" radial arm saw in the production area did not have provisions to prevent unintended restart in the event of a power outage.    b)    On or about May 12, 2015, the 12" radial arm saw in the production area did not have provisions to prevent unintended restart in the event of a power outage.     Abatement certification required per 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.307 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.307(c)(2)(i): Equipment in hazardous (classified) location(s) was not approved for the ignitable or combustible properties of the specific gas, vapor, dust, or fiber that was or could be present:    On or about May 12, 2015, outlets on the production floor were not rated for the combustible saw dust produced in the area.     Abatement certification required per 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    The employer did not document that a PPE hazard assessment had been performed for the various job hazards in the facility.     Abatement certification required per 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    The employer did not have a written HAZCOM program for chemicals used by employees such as lubricating oil.     Abatement certification required per 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340629179.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.