HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: AMERITEK DESIGN, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AMERITEK DESIGN, INC. in 14203 LUTHE RD., HOUSTON, TX 77039 (NAICS 337212). OSHA activity number 340633437.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AMERITEK DESIGN, INC.
- Site address
- 14203 LUTHE RD.
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77039
- Mailing
- 14203 LUTHE RD., HOUSTON, TX 77039
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 337212
- Employees
- 16
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer does not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from the recognized hazards of being struck-by which are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: This violation was observed on or about May 14, 2015, throughout the production area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating pneumatic tools and equipment connected to Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) compressed air piping pressurized to approximately 95 psi. The PVC piping was designed for water pressure. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation describing the actions it is taking to ensure that employees are not exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $850 Reduced
W103
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition. The employer does not keep the production area clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition. This violation was occurred on or about May 14, 2015, and times prior thereto, where employees in the southwest corner of the production area were exposed to a fire hazard from combustible dust when manufacturing wooden products without the area being kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms are kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $850
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $850 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: The employer does not develop, document and utilize procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy. a. This violation occurred on or about May 14, 2015 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical shock and struck-by hazards when servicing a SCM Sigma Impact beam saw in the SW corner without developing, documenting, and utilizing written energy control procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy. b. This violation occurred on or about May 14, 2015 and times prior thereto, where employees in the warehouse area were exposed to electrical shock and struck-by hazards when servicing a SCM Sigma Impact beam saw in the NW corner without developing, documenting, and utilizing written energy control procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy. c. This violation occurred on or about May 14, 2015 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical shock and struck-by hazards when servicing a SCM Edge Bander, Model Olimpic S2000, in the central shop area without developing, documenting, and utilizing written energy control procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy. d. This violation occurred on or about May 14, 2015 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical shock and struck-by hazards when servicing a Morbidelli CNC Mill, Model A600K, in the NW corner without developing, documenting, and utilizing written energy control procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy. e. This violation occurred on or about May 14, 2015 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical shock and caught-in hazards when servicing an Accu-Systems Dial Bore, Model H29, along the north wall near the spray area without developing, documenting, and utilizing written energy control procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that procedures are developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in activities covered by this section.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $850
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.307 C
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
W103
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.307(c): Equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous (classified) locations were not intrinsically safe, approved for the hazardous (classified) location, or safe for the hazardous (classified) location: The employer does not ensure electrical equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous areas are intrinsically safe, approved for the hazardous location, or safe for the location. a. This violation was observed on or about May 14, 2015, where employees in the spray area were exposed to a fire hazard when Lokweld 951 Adhesive, a Class 1B flammable liquid was sprayed without the electrical equipment and wiring being approved or safe for the hazardous location. b. This violation was observed on or about May 14, 2015, where employees in the SW production area were exposed to a fire hazard when manufacturing wood products that created Class II combustible dust without the electrical equipment and wiring being approved or safe for the hazardous location. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous locations are intrinsically safe, approved for the hazardous location, or safe for the hazardous location.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.106 E02 II B 2
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(ii)(b)(2): The quantity of liquid that may be located outside of an inside storage room or storage cabinet in a building or in any one fire area of a building exceeded 120 gallons of Class IB, IC, II or III liquids in containers. The employer does not maintain the quantity of Category 2 flammable liquids located outside of an inside storage room or cabinet in a building below 120 gallons. This violation occurred on or about May 14, 2014, and times prior thereto, where four 55-gallon drums of Lokweld 951 Adhesive and 7/1-gallon cans of Startex Lacquer Retarder were stored in the Spray area without being in an inside storage room or storage cabinet. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that the quantity of liquid that is located outside of an inside storage room or storage cabinet in a building or in any one fire area of a building does not exceed 120 gallons of Class IB, IC, II or III liquids in containers..
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.107 D02
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(d)(2): All spraying areas were not provided with mechanical ventilation adequate to remove flammable vapors, mists, or powders to a safe location and to confine and control combustible residues so that life was not endangered. The employer does not provide ventilation in spraying areas to adequately remove flammable vapors. This violation occurred on or about May 14, 2014, and times prior thereto, where employees in the spray area applied Lokweld 951 Adhesive without ventilation to remove flammable vapors. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all spraying areas are provided with mechanical ventilation adequate to remove flammable vapors, mists, or powders to a safe location and to confine and control combustible residues so that life is not endangered.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: The employer does not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program. This violation occurred on or about May 14, 2015, where employees in the spray area were allowed to use a 3M cartridge half-face respirators without a written respiratory program. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that a written respiratory protection program that include the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures is established and implemented for required respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 337212)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340633437.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.