ROME, GA —
OSHA Inspection: GEORGIA MACHINE WORKS, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of GEORGIA MACHINE WORKS, INC. in 175 PINSON ROAD, ROME, GA 30161 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 340634666.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GEORGIA MACHINE WORKS, INC.
- Site address
- 175 PINSON ROAD
- City
- ROME
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30161
- Mailing
- 175 PINSON ROAD, ROME, GA 30161
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: the employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a) Throughout the facility - The Yale forklift (model # G88P-050-SAS-086; serial # P286979) was not equipped with a seatbelt, exposing employees to fractures and lacerations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.38 B
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review: a) Throughout the facility - The employer did not ensure that a written emergency action plan was in place in the event of a fire, tornado, or other disasters, exposing employees to possible smoke inhalation, burns, and upper respiratory irritations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a) The spray welder was exposed to noise levels at 73.47% of the action level dose (8-hour time weighted average sound level of 85 decibels) or an equivalent sound level of 87.7 dBA during 220 minute sampling period on May 28, 2015. The employee could be exposed to noise induced hearing loss.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.253 B04 I
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(i): Oxygen cylinders were stored near highly combustible material, especially oil and grease; or near reserve stocks of carbide and acetylene or other fuel-gas cylinders, or near other substance likely to cause or accelerate fire; or a) In the northwest corner of the building - Oxygen cylinders were stored next to acetylene gas cylinders, exposing employees to 2nd degree burns, smoke inhalation, and upper respiratory distress.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Throughout the facility - The employer did not establish a written hazard communication program for the employees exposed to hazardous substances such as, but not limited to: propane, welding gases (oxygen, acetylene, and argon), and parts cleaning solvent (containing: 1,2,4 trimethylbenzene, xylene, and petroleum hydrocarbons), exposing the employees to respiratory, eye, and skin irritations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use: a) Throughout the facility - The employer did not provide all the safety data sheets (SDS) for employees who were required to work with chemicals, such as but not limited to: propane, welding gases (oxygen, acetylene, and argon), and parts cleaning solvent (containing: 1,2,4 trimethylbenzene, xylene, and petroleum hydrocarbons), exposing employees to respiratory, eye, and skin irritations.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Throughout the facility - The employer did not provide training, to include the new Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) that became effective December 1, 2013, to employees exposed to hazardous substances such as, but not limited to: propane, welding gases (oxygen, acetylene, and argon), and parts cleaning solvent (containing: 1,2,4 trimethylbenzene, xylene, and petroleum hydrocarbons), exposing employees to respiratory, eye, and skin irritations.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed: a) On the south east side of the building - An emergency exit door was blocked by ventilation hosing, preventing an employee from exiting that area in the event of an emergency.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Poreba lathe, spray welding operation - The employer did not establish a written respiratory protection program, to include training, medical evaluations, and fit testing, for the employee required to wear a 3M half mask air purifying respirator while spray welding and grinding on steel.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 D03 II
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not provide a respirator that was appropriate for the chemical state and physical form of the contaminant: a) Poreba lathe, spray welding operation - The employer provided the spray welder with a 3M 5303 respirator cartridge (organic vapor and acid gas), which was not appropriate for the welding operation being conducted, exposing the employee to upper respiratory irritations.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications or additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed without the manufacturer's prior written approval: a) Throughout the facility, the employees operated a Yale forklift (model # G88P-050-SAS-086, serial # P286979) which was converted from a gas fueled engine to a propane fuel engine without the manufacturers prior written approval.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Georgia Machine Works, INC.
View Georgia Machine Works, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340634666.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.