Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MEGA CITY BUILDING SOLUTIONS INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of MEGA CITY BUILDING SOLUTIONS INC. in 4326 SOUTHWICK BLVD., BRUNSWICK, OH 44212 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 340635309.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mega City Building Solutions INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mega City Building Solutions INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4326 SOUTHWICK BLVD.
City
BRUNSWICK
State
OH
ZIP
44212
Mailing
204 MIAMO AVE, BELLEFONTAINE, OH 43311
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:     On or about May 18, 2015 at a job site located at 4326 Southwick Blvd., Brunswick, OH 44212, during construction activities including but not limited to masonry installation, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program. Employees were required to wear filtering face-piece respirators during cutting and mixing mortar while installing concrete block.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:   On or about May 29, 2014 at a job site located at 4326 Southwick, Brunswick OH, 44212, during construction activities including but not limited to masonry installation, the employer did not effectively evaluate employee exposure to crystalline silica exposure while employees were required to mix mortar during block laying operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:   On or about May 18, 2015 at a job site located at 4326 Southwick,Brunswick OH 44212,  during construction activities including but not limited to masonry installation, the employer did not ensure employees wearing tight-fitting respirators are fit tested prior to use of the respirator. Employees were required to wear respirators during mixing operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)    On or about May 18, 2015 at a job site located at 4326 Southwick Blvd., Brunswick, OH 44212, during construction activities including but not limited to masonry work from an elevated platform, the employer did not ensure employees working from an elevated platform were protected from fall hazards approximately 20 feet by fully planking each working level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph.    On or about May 18, 2015 at a job site located at 4326 Southwick Blvd., Brunswick, OH 44212, during construction activities including but not limited to masonry work from an elevated platform, the employer did not ensure employees working from an elevated platform were protected from fall hazards approximately 20 feet when the east scaffold was not restrained from tipping.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:     On or about May 18, 2015 at a job site located at 4326 Southwick Blvd., Brunswick, OH 44212, during construction activities including but not limited to masonry work from an elevated platform, the employer did not ensure employees working from an elevated platform were protected from fall hazards approximately 20 feet by a guardrail system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 H02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2): Employees working below a scaffold were not protected from falling tools, materials or equipment in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (h)(2)(i)-(v) of this section:    On or about May 18, 2015 at a job site located at 4326 Southwick Blvd., Brunswick, OH 44212, during construction activities including but not limited to masonry work from an elevated platform, the employer did not ensure employees working below the platform were protected from struck by hazards when toe boards were not installed on the working level of the scaffold at a height of approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

View Mega City Building Solutions INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340635309.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.