WATERFORD, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: STEPHEN WOODWARD
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STEPHEN WOODWARD in 730 BECK DR., WATERFORD, WI 53185 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340636406.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STEPHEN WOODWARD
- Site address
- 730 BECK DR.
- City
- WATERFORD
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53185
- Mailing
- 21438 WASHINGTON AVE., KANSASVILLE, WI 53139
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 22, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): (a) Frequent and regular inspections of the job site were not conducted by a competent person to ensure hazardous situations were found and corrected.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $700
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. (a) The employer did not ensure that employees using pneumatic nail guns were wearing eye protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $700
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: (a) Employees conducting roofing activities on a 5:12 pitch roof were not protected from falling to the lower level.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees exposed to fall hazards had been trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazards associated with their work.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340636406.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.