Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CONNECTICUT ROOFING COMPANY, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CONNECTICUT ROOFING COMPANY, INC. in LOOS & COMPANY, ROUTE 101 & 169, POMFRET, CT 06258 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340639764.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Connecticut Roofing Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Connecticut Roofing Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
LOOS & COMPANY, ROUTE 101 & 169
City
POMFRET
State
CT
ZIP
06258
Mailing
90 CODFISH FALLS ROAD, STORRS MANSFIELD, CT 06268
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.502 F01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1)(iv): When the path to the point of access was not in use, a rope, wire, chain, or other barricade, equivalent in strength and height to the warning line, was not placed across the path at the point where the path intersected the warning line erected around the work area, or the path shall be offset such that a person cannot walk directly into the work area.  On or about 05/18/2015 at the Loos & Company Re-Roofing Project, employees were accessing the work area from a ladder and were also accessing the dumpster area and no barricade or rope or wire was placed across the path.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.502 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1): Warning lines were not erected around all sides of the roof work area:  On or about 05/18/2015 at the Loos & Company Re-Roofing Project, employees were working on the roof deck using a warning line system with approximately 30 feet by 30 feet of the warning line system that was missing from the North/East corner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 H01 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(v): The safety monitor had other responsibilities which could take the monitor's attention from the monitoring function:  On or about 05/18/2015 at the Loos & Company Re-Roofing Project, the monitor was hauling debris from the monitoring area to the dumping area on the other side of the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340639764.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.