Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CHAMTEK MFG., INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CHAMTEK MFG., INC. in 123 LOUISE STREET, ROCHESTER, NY 14606 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 340647486.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Chamtek MFG., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Chamtek MFG., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CHAMTEK MFG., INC.
Site address
123 LOUISE STREET
City
ROCHESTER
State
NY
ZIP
14606
Mailing
123 LOUISE STREET, ROCHESTER, NY 14606
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
23
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2015
Abate by
Jul 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    a) On or about 05/22/15 in the Sheet Metal shop; employer failed to protect employees involved in die changing on the Amada press brakes from caught between hazards by allowing employees to take the pressure off the bed while leaving the machine operational during die changes.            ABATEMENT CERTFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks, created by the pim machine caught between hazard, horizontal band saw unused portion of the blade not guarded contact hazard:    a) On or about 05/22/15 in the Sheet Metal area; employer failed to protect employees who operate the Marvel brand horizontal band saw from contact with a moving saw blade when the unused portion of the blade was not guarded.      NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1040
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2015
Abate by
Jul 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    a) On or about 05/22/15 in the Sheet Metal area; employer failed to protect employees who operate the Amada brand press brakes ( RG-100 & RG 50 ) from caught between hazards during the bending and shaping of various parts.      b) a) On or about 05/22/15 in the Sheet Metal area; employer failed to protect employees who operate the pem machine from caught between hazards when the ram opening was 2 inches and the employee's fingers were as close as 1/2 inch.      ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.215 B05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $780 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(5): The angular exposure of grinding wheel periphery and sides for safety guards used on surface grinding machine(s) employing the wheel periphery exceeded 150 degrees:    a) On or about 05/22/15 in the grinding area; employer failed to protect employees who operated the surface grinder, FSG-618M, from caught on hazards of the moving grinding wheel, when they allowed the machine to be used with the wheel not guarded and the guard laid on the side of machine.        NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $780
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2015
Abate by
Jul 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):     a) On or about 05/22/15 throughout the shop; employer failed to protect employees from the hazards associated with handling hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to, Emersol Solvent ( combustible), when they did not develop a written hazard communication program.      ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Chamtek MFG., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340647486.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.