WASHBURN, IL —
OSHA Inspection: ULRICH MOTOR COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ULRICH MOTOR COMPANY in 328 W PARKSIDE DR, WASHBURN, IL 61570 (NAICS 441110). OSHA activity number 340647932.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ULRICH MOTOR COMPANY
- Site address
- 328 W PARKSIDE DR
- City
- WASHBURN
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61570
- Mailing
- 328 W PARKSIDE DR, WASHBURN, IL 61570
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 441110
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 A08 II
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(8)(ii): Every floor hole which persons can accidentally walk was not guarded by a floor hole cover of standard strength and construction: Employees working in the Service Area were exposed to trip hazards because the exhaust vent located in the walkaway was not provided with a cover.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $500
- — C (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.36 E02
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(e)(2): The door(s) that connected any room to an exit route did not swing out in the direction of exit travel: An employee working in the Detail Bay was exposed to the hazards of smoke inhalation and burns because the exit doors located on the northwest and southwest walls did not swing out.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $500
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit": An employee working in the Detail Bay was exposed to the hazards of smoke inhalation and burns because the doors located on the northwest and southwest walls were not marked with an Exit sign.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: An employee working in the Detail Bay was performing automobile detailing activities which required personal protective equipment to be worn, and the employer had not conducted a PPE hazard assessment and equipment selection to protect the employee from the hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $500
- — C (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: An employee working in the Detail Bay was performing automobile detailing activities which required personal protective equipment to be worn, and the employer did not verify that a hazard assessment and equipment selection had been performed.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who was required by this section to use personal protective equipment: An employee working in the Detail Bay was performing automobile detailing activities which required personal protective equipment to be worn and the employer did not provide adequate training to the employee required to use personal protective equipment.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: An employee working in the Detail Bay was exposed to the hazard of eye contact with hazardous chemicals and the employee was not required to wear appropriate eye protection.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes: An employee working in the Detail Bay was exposed to the hazards of skin absorption of harmful chemicals while performing automobile detailing activities and the employee was not required to wear appropriate hand protection.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: Employees working in the Service Area were exposed to eye injuries while changing car batteries and an emergency eyewash that could provide the required fifteen minutes of flushing was not available for immediate use.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $500
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.305 A02 I
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(a)(2)(i): Temporary electrical power and lighting installation(s) 600 volts, nominal, or less were used in prohibited manners: Employees working in the Service Area and Detail Bay were exposed to smoke inhalations and burns because the overhead lights were not permanently installed.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $500
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.305 J02 IV
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(2)(iv): A receptacle installed in a wet or damp location was not suitable for the location: An employee working in the Detail Bay was exposed to electrical hazards while plugging in and using equipment because the receptacles were not suitable for a wet and damp location.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $500
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 F06 I
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(v): Employees working in the Detail Bay and Service Area were exposed to hazardous chemicals and the contents were not marked with the appropriate chemical identity and hazard warning.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: Employees working in the Detail Bay and Service Area were exposed to hazardous chemicals and safety data sheets were not available.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 441110)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340647932.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.