TUSCALOOSA, AL —
OSHA Inspection: RAY MONTGOMERY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RAY MONTGOMERY in 1506 8TH STEET #1, TUSCALOOSA, AL 35401 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 340655216.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RAY MONTGOMERY
- Site address
- 1506 8TH STEET #1
- City
- TUSCALOOSA
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 35401
- Mailing
- 13931 SOKEY HOLLOW ROAD, NORTHPORT, AL 35475
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l) and as referenced by the note contained in 1926.602(d): a) Telehandler: On or about May 14, 2015 and times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that training and evaluation was completed prior to allowing an employee to operate the telehandler which exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: a) Telehandler: On or about May 14, 2015, the employer allowed the use of a job made wooden platform supported on the forks of the telehandler prior to providing training on the requirements which exposed an employee to falls up to 30-feet. b) Telehandler: On or about May 14, 2015, the employer allowed the use of a prefabricated metal platform supported on the forks of the telehandler prior to providing training on the requirements which exposed an employee to falls up to 30-feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person: a) Telehandler: On or about May 14, 2015, the employer did not ensure the job made wooden platform supported on the forks and used to elevate personnel was designed by someone who, by possession of a recognized degree, certificate, or professional standing, or who by extensive knowledge, training, and experience, has successfully demonstrated the ability to solve or resolve problems related to the scaffolding systems which exposed employees to scaffolding hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 F06
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6): a) On or about May 14, 2015, the employer allowed a job made wooden platform supported on the forks to elevate personnel within 10-feet of an energized, uninsulated power line which exposed employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.602 C01
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1): Industrial trucks did not meet the requirements of 1926.600 when a minimum clearance of 10 feet was not maintained between the lines and any part of the forklift or load: a) Telehandler: On or about May 14, 2015, the employer did not ensure at least 10-feet of clearance was maintained from an uninsulated 120 V distribution power line which exposed employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: a) Telehandler: On or about May 15, 2015, the employer allowed the person being elevated in a job made wooden platform supported on the forks to attach his person fall arrest system to the webbing of a tie down strap, used to secure the platform to the telehandler's backrest, which exposed the employee to falls up to 30-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.602 C01 II
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions affecting the safe operation of the equipment were made without the manufacturer's written approval: a) Telehandler: On or about May 14, 2015, the employer did not seek or obtain the manufacturer's written approval and updated documentation prior to allowing the use of a job-made wooden personnel platform with the telehandler which exposed employees to forklift related hazards. b) Telehandler: On or about May 14, 2015 and prior thereto, the employer did not seek or obtain the manufacturer's written approval and updated documentation prior to allowing the use of a metal personnel platform with the telehandler which exposed employees to forklift related hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1052 C01 II
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: a) East Stairway: On or about May 14, 2015 and times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure stairrail systems were provided and used for all section of the stairs and landing platforms with unprotected edges which exposed employees to falls up to 19-feet to the ground below. b) West Stairway: On or about May 14, 2015 and times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure stairrail systems were provided and used for all section of the stairs and landing platforms with unprotected edges which exposed employees to falls up to 19-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections at RAY Montgomery
View RAY Montgomery's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340655216.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.