MESQUITE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: NATALIE STIMPSON, PC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NATALIE STIMPSON, PC in 2615 INTERSTATE 30, MESQUITE, TX 75150 (NAICS 621210). OSHA activity number 340659952.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NATALIE STIMPSON, PC
- Site address
- 2615 INTERSTATE 30
- City
- MESQUITE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75150
- Mailing
- 2615 INTERSTATE 30, MESQUITE, TX 75150
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621210
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 II
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii): The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not contain at least the elements in 29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(A) through (c)(1)(ii)(C): (a) The employer's bloodborne pathogens exposure control plan did not include the exposure determination containing a list of job classifications in which all employees have exposure, a list of job classifications in which some employees have exposure, and a list of tasks and procedures performed by those employees in classifications where some employees may have exposure.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1030 D03 I
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(3)(i): When there was occupational exposure, the employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, appropriate personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to, gloves, gowns, laboratory coats, face shields, masks, eye protection, and mouthpieces, resuscitation bags, pocket masks, or other ventilation devices: (a) In the operatories, employees assisting with dental procedures including, but not limited to, surgical extractions and implants, were not provided with appropriate personal protective equipment such as laboratory coats.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1030 D04 II A
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(ii)(A): Contaminated work surfaces were not decontaminated with an appropriate disinfectant after completion of procedures: (a) In the operatories, Lysol wipes were used for cleaning contaminated surfaces.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1030 D04 III A 2 I
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(A)(2)(i): During use, containers for contaminated sharps were not easily accessible to personnel or located as close as was feasible to the immediate area where sharps were used or could be reasonably anticipated to be found: (a) Containers for contaminated sharps were not located as close as feasible to the operatories where dental procedures were performed.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1030 G02 I
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program: (a) Employees who had occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials from dental procedures had not participated in a training program that included initial and annual training.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to, MaxiCide and CaviCide disinfectants.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections at Natalie Stimpson, PC
View Natalie Stimpson, PC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621210)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340659952.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.