Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ELEGANCE COATING LTD.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ELEGANCE COATING LTD. in 33 WEST SERVICE ROAD, CHAMPLAIN, NY 12919 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 340673433.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Elegance Coating LTD. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Elegance Coating LTD. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
33 WEST SERVICE ROAD
City
CHAMPLAIN
State
NY
ZIP
12919
Mailing
33 WEST SERVICE ROAD, CHAMPLAIN, NY 12919
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
56
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2015
Abate by
Sep 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,365 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): Spray booths were not readily accessible for cleaning with a clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides and kept free from storage or combustible construction:      (a) On or about 6/02/2015, at the facility, for the painter and employees working near the spray booths.  The employer did not keep the spray booths free from combustible storage by storing items such as, but not limited to cardboard boxes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1365
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,275 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference 1926.59)      (a) On and before 6/02/2015, at facility, for the painter and sander working on buses containing hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, acetone and dust.  Employees were not provided with information and training on the hazards of the chemicals they work with or are exposed to in their work area whenever new hazards were introduced in to work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2275
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: (Construction Reference 1926.59)    (a) On and before 6/02/2015, at facility, for the painter and sander working on buses containing hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, acetone and dust.  Employees were not provided with information and training on the hazards of the chemicals they work with or are exposed to in their work area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,275 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In the workplace where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or where respirators were required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures including the provisions (i)-(ix) of this section, as applicable:     (a) On or about 6/02/2015, at the facility, for the sander and painter wearing a 3M half face respirator and Gerson half face respirator while working on buses.  The employer did not implement a worksite-specific respiratory protection program for employees required to use respirators.      Abatement Note:      The Respiratory Protection Program shall include the following sections:     (1) Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace;   (2) Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators;    (3) Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators;   (4) Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency    situations;   (5) Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing,   discarding, and otherwise maintaining respirators;    (6) Procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for atmosphere-   supplying respirators (if used);   (7) Training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during    routine and emergency situations;    (8) Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing   them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance; and   (9) Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2275
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.134 D03 III B 2

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(B)(2): The employer did not implement a change schedule for respirators not equipped with an End of Service Life Indicator ESLI that would ensure cartridges were changed before the end of their service life:      (a) On or about 06/02/2015, at facility, for the sander and painter wearing 3M half-face respirator and Gerson half face respirator while working on buses.  The employee was not provided a cartridge changeout schedule prior to being required to wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee can demonstrate knowledge of why the respirator was necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator:    (a) On or about 6/02/2015, at the facility, for sander and painter wearing a 3M half face respirator and Gerson half face respirator while working on buses.  The employer did not train employee on respiratory protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:      (a) On or about 6/02/2015, at the facility, for the sander and painter wearing a 3M half face respirator and Gerson half face respirator while working on buses.  The employee was not provided a medical evaluation prior to being required to wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 27, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  The employer did not ensure that employees using tight fitting face piece respirators pass an appropriate qualitative or quantitative fit test prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.    (a)  On or about 6/02/2015, at the facility, for the sander and painter wearing a 3M half face respirator and Gerson half face respirator while working on buses.  The employee was not fit tested, either qualitatively or quantitatively, prior to being required to use this respirator by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340673433.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.