ANNA MARIA, FL —
OSHA Inspection: PAT CARLTON CONSTRUCTION INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PAT CARLTON CONSTRUCTION INC. in 94 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, ANNA MARIA, FL 34216 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340678341.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PAT CARLTON CONSTRUCTION INC.
- Site address
- 94 NORTH SHORE DRIVE
- City
- ANNA MARIA
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 34216
- Mailing
- 11055 STATE ROAD 39, DUETTE, FL 34219
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: a) For employees working at 94 North Shore Drive in Anna Maria, as observed on or about June 03, 2015. Employees were in an elevated aerial lift without the use of a personal fall arrest system harness and lanyard attached to the basket.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) For employees working at 94 North Shore Drive in Anna Maria, as observed on or about June 03, 2015. Employees were installing roofing sheathing without the use of a fall protection system. Employees were exposed to a fall height of approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(c): When employees were exposed to falling objects, the employer did not implement one of the following measures; -1 Erect toeboards, screens, or guardrail systems to prevent objects from falling from higher levels; or, -2 Erect a canopy structure; or -3 Barricade the area to which objects could fall, prevent employees from entering the barricaded area, and keep objects away from the edge of the higher level. a) For employees working at 94 North Shore Drive in Anna Maria, as observed on or about June 03, 2015. Employees were working beneath employees installing plywood sheathing on the roof. Employees were approximately 20 feet beneath the employees on the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.502 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(1): The top edge height of the top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members, was not 42 inches (1.1 m) plus or minus 3 inches (8 cm) above the walking/working level: a) For employees working at 94 North Shore Drive in Anna Maria, as observed on or about June 03, 2015. Employees were working on the second floor where the height of the cable was approximately 38 inches to the floor at rest. The cable was loose enough that the cable measured approximately 33 1/4 inches above the floor when force was applied in a downward direction on the cable.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.502 B03
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(3): Guardrail systems were not capable of withstanding, without failure, a force of at least 200 pounds (890 N) applied within 2 inches (5.1 cm) of the top edge, in any outward or downward direction, at any point along the top edge: a) For employees working at 94 North Shore Drive in Anna Maria, as observed on or about June 03, 2015. Employees were working on the second floor with cable guardrails that were not attached to an anchor point capable of withstanding a force of at least 200 pounds. The cable end was not connected to anything.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 B05
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(5): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, solid panels, and equivalent structural members were not capable of withstanding, without failure, a force of at least 150 pounds (666 N) applied in any downward or outward direction at any point along the midrail or other member. a) For employees working at 94 North Shore Drive in Anna Maria, as observed on or about June 03, 2015. Employees were working on the second floor with cable guardrail midrails that were not attached to an anchor point capable of withstanding a force of at least 150 pounds. The cable end was not connected to anything.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
ENCINITAS, CA—2026-07-13
LOU RIDDLE CONSTRUCTION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-10
IDAHO HOMES CONSTRUCTION LLC
KIMBERLY, WI—2026-07-10
ENRIQUE RESENDIC
METTER, GA—2026-07-10
M.A.P.C CONSTRUCTION, LLC
SLINGER, WI—2026-07-10
RAMIREZ HOME BUILDERS LLC
More inspections in FL
MARIANNA, FL—2026-07-13
PRIMETIME MOBILE MASONRY LLC
MELBOURNE, FL—2026-07-13
OMNIPOTENT BRANDS, LLC
QUINCY, FL—2026-07-13
WALMART
INDIAN ROCKS BEACH, FL—2026-07-10
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
CLEARWATER, FL—2026-07-10
ROOFTECH ROOFING & WATERPROOFING INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340678341.