BIDWELL, OH —
OSHA Inspection: SUMMIT HEALTH, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SUMMIT HEALTH, INC. in 8785 STATE ROUTE 160, BIDWELL, OH 45614 (NAICS 621999). OSHA activity number 340679216.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUMMIT HEALTH, INC.
- Site address
- 8785 STATE ROUTE 160
- City
- BIDWELL
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45614
- Mailing
- 27175 HAGGERTY ROAD, NOVI, MI 48377
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621999
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 D02 IX
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3400.00 · Current $3400.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(ix): Eating, drinking, smoking, applying cosmetics or lip balm, and handling contact lenses are prohibited in work areas where there is a reasonable likelihood of occupational exposure. a. At the work site, employees who worked at biometric stations performing blood sampling and testing kept drinks and snacks on the tables next to the used sharps containers. The employer did not ensure that employees kept food and drinks out of the work area where blood was known to be present.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3400
- — Z (S) $3400
1910.1030 D03 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(3)(ii): Use. The employer shall ensure that the employee uses appropriate personal protective equipment unless the employer shows that the employee temporarily and briefly declined to use personal protective equipment when, under rare and extraordinary circumstances, it was the employee's professional judgment that in the specific instance its use would have prevented the delivery of health care or public safety services or would have posed an increased hazard to the safety of the worker or co-worker. When the employee makes this judgement, the circumstances shall be investigated and documented in order to determine whether changes can be instituted to prevent such occurrences in the future. a. At the work site, employees who worked biometric testing stations where blood was sampled and tested were provided with lab coats by the employer. The employer did not ensure that all employees used personal protective equipment that included (but was not limited to) lab coats.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 II A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3400.00 · Current $3400.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii): Training shall be provided as follows: 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(A): At the time of initial assignment to tasks where occupational exposure may take place; a. At the work site, employees who worked at biometric stations performing blood sampling and testing had not been adequately trained about the hazards of and exposure to blood borne pathogens. The employer did not ensure that employees had completed adequate training prior to assigning them to the work area where blood was known to be present.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3400
- — Z (S) $3400
1910.1030 G02 II B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii): Training shall be provided as follows: 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(B): At least annually thereafter. a. At the work site, employees who worked at biometric stations performing blood sampling and testing had not been trained annually on the hazards of and exposure to blood borne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 VII F
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii): The training program shall contain at a minimum the following elements: 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(F): An explanation of the use and limitations of methods that will prevent or reduce exposure including appropriate engineering controls, work practices, and personal protective equipment; a. At the work site, employees who worked at biometric stations performing blood sampling and testing had not been adequately trained about the hazards of and exposure to blood borne pathogens. The employer did not ensure that employees had completed adequate training prior to assigning them to the work area where blood was known to be present.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621999)
PONTIAC, MI—2026-07-09
MCLAREN OAKLAND
VALLEJO, CA—2026-06-30
KAISER PERMANENTE (CALL CENTER)
PICO RIVERA, CA—2026-06-26
RIVIERA HEALTHCARE CENTER
CAMDEN, SC—2026-06-17
77531 - DATAVANT
LOUISVILLE, KY—2026-06-08
69186 - INTACT PROFESSIONAL HEALTH - SAFETY SERVICES INC
More inspections in OH
OXFORD, OH—2026-07-13
R&R SIDING LLC
CONNEAUT, OH—2026-07-13
CONTINENTAL STRUCTURAL PLASTICS
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
HARRISON, OH—2026-07-10
WEBER FAMILY FARMS LLC
JEFFERSON, OH—2026-07-10
LAKE CITY PLATING LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340679216.