Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MNM CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MNM CONSTRUCTION in 3783 SILVER BELL ROAD, MIDDLETON, WI 53562 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340682889.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MNM Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MNM Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MNM CONSTRUCTION
Site address
3783 SILVER BELL ROAD
City
MIDDLETON
State
WI
ZIP
53562
Mailing
17730 W. EMERY ROAD, EVANSVILLE, WI 53536
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 8, 2016
Abate by
Feb 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:    (a) The employer did not submit abatement documentation and certification for Citations 1 Item 1, Citation 1 Item 2, Citation 1 Item 3 and Citation 1 Item 4 for lack of protection from falls, lack of fall protection training, break in elevation greater than 19 inches, and lack of securing of portable ladders, respectively.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2015
Abate by
Nov 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   On or about June 2, 2015, employees working to install trusses were not protected from exposure to falls to lower levels.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2015
Abate by
Dec 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  A training program for fall hazards was not provided for employees performing residential framing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2015
Abate by
Nov 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:   Access to the home at the front door had a break in elevation greater than 19 inches.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2015
Abate by
Nov 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.    A Werner step ladder used to access the top of the walls did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing nor was it secured with a grasping device provided.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340682889.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.