NILES, OH —
OSHA Inspection: ALCOA ATEP, NILES
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ALCOA ATEP, NILES in 1000 WARREN AVENUE, NILES, OH 44446 (NAICS 331491). OSHA activity number 340691096.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALCOA ATEP, NILES
- Site address
- 1000 WARREN AVENUE
- City
- NILES
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44446
- Mailing
- 1000 WARREN AVENUE, NILES, OH 44446
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331491
- Employees
- 540
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 C
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(c): Personal protective equipment was not of safe design and construction for the work to be performed: On or about June 8, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees performing monthly preventative maintenance on the Morgan 5 ton crane located in the Maintenance Bay were protected against a fall of approximately 20 feet by utilizing certified, designated tie off points.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. On or about June 9, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that employees operating the manual lathe, RMI Titanium Company number 30195, were protected against contact with the rotating chuck. b. On or about June 9, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees operating the Bridgeport Drill Press, serial number J22809 were protected against contact with the rotating chuck and bit. c. On or about June 9, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees operating the Lucas Machine Horizontal Mill, serial number 4280617 were protected against contact with the rotating chuck and bit.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposed an employee to injury, was not guarded: On or about June 9, 2015, the employer failed to ensure employees operating the Do All Vertical Saw, serial number 290-8111383 were protected against contact with the unused portion of the blade.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.179 K01 II
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(k)(1)(ii): The trip setting of hoist limit switches was not determined by tests with an empty hook traveling in increasing speeds up to the maximum speed: On or about June 8, 2015, the employer failed to ensure daily upper limit switch checks were performed for the Morgan 5 ton crane located in the maintenance bay prior to use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.179 J02 III
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iii): Monthly inspections of hooks, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the hook inspected, were not performed: On or about June 8, 2015, the employer failed to ensure certified hook inspections were performed and documented for the Morgan 5 ton crane located in the maintenance bay.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.179 J02 IV
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv): Monthly inspections of hoist chains, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier of the chain which was inspected, were not performed: On or about June 8, 2015, the employer failed to ensure certified chain inspections were performed and documented for the Morgan 5 ton crane located in the maintenance bay.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Alcoa Atep, Niles
View Alcoa Atep, Niles's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331491)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340691096.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.