RICEBORO, GA —
OSHA Inspection: SNF HOLDING COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SNF HOLDING COMPANY in 1 CHEMICAL PLANT ROAD, RICEBORO, GA 31323 (NAICS 325998). OSHA activity number 340699214.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch SNF Holding Company — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SNF Holding Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SNF HOLDING COMPANY
- Site address
- 1 CHEMICAL PLANT ROAD
- City
- RICEBORO
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31323
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 250, RICEBORO, GA 31323
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325998
- Employees
- 650
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that the employer delayed evaluation, care, and/or treatment from a medical provider, which could result in health hazards such as, but not limited to, increased risk of infection, prolonged healing and/or scarring, exacerbation of pain, and limited recovery from work-related injuries/illnesses that required medical treatment. a) Throughout Facility - On or about May 22, 2015, an employee who was treated and/or evaluated at the onsite medical clinic for a hand laceration was exposed to health hazards such as, but not limited to, increased risk of infection, prolonged healing and/or scarring, exacerbation of pain, and limited recovery from injuries/illnesses that required medical treatment. b) Throughout Facility - On or about July 6, 2015 and at times prior to, an employee who was treated and/or evaluated at the onsite medical clinic for skin blisters on both hands, wrists, and forearms was exposed to health hazards such as, but not limited to, increased risk of infection, prolonged healing and/or scarring, exacerbation of pain, and limited recovery from injuries/illnesses that required medical treatment. Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable means of abatement to correct this hazard would be: 1. Establish and utilize protocols outlining clear roles for the nurse, physician, provider, and employer to follow. Such protocols should be developed as a collaboration between nursing staff and the physician and should follow Georgia Board of Nursing and Georgia Medical Practice Act standards and any applicable rules and regulations. 2. Implement the Georgia RN Scope of Practice Decision Tree as a guide in determining if an activity or a task is in his or her scope of practice as an RN (Georgia Registered Professional Nurse Practice Act O.C.G.A. 43-26-1). 3. Develop and utilize additional written clinical protocols that: a. Are up-to-date and evidence-based for common symptoms, complaints, or injuries/illnesses and are consistent with national standards and guidelines; b. Include written procedures for nursing triage to include when the physician/provider must be consulted, verbal/telephone orders, dispensing medications, referrals for offsite care, delegation of duties to unlicensed assistive personnel, appropriate documentation, and other duties as appropriate; c. Promote early referral for definitive diagnosis and medical treatment (e.g. to a physician, either or offsite); and d. Include early evaluation of workers? job duties and work station to prevent workers? returning jobs that aggravate their symptoms and injuries. 4. Provide training from a physician to educate the clinic staff and EHS Superintendents on triage of injuries/illnesses and when first aid is inappropriate (e.g. injury/illness requires treatment beyond first aid) and document the training. 5. Arrange a formal review and update of written protocols at least annually or more frequently if needed. It should ensure that the review is undertaken by a physician with formal training and/or certification in occupational medicine. 6. Include provisions in the physician?s contract that the Supervising Physician will have oversight over the RN to include reviewing an appropriate sampling of nursing notes (paper and electronic, e.g. OHM). 7. Include provision in the physician?s contract that the Supervising Physician will review, countersign with original signature, and date all verbal/telephone orders given to the nurse within a specified timeframe as well as all associated paper/electronic nursing notes. 8. Include provision in the physician?s contract that the Supervising Physician will review all notes resulting from referrals to off-site physicians within a specified timeframe.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.147 A02 II
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(a)(2)(ii): Alternative measures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by the exception of 1910.147(a)(2)(ii) for routine, repetitive, and integral processes such as tool change, change over, and cleaning: a) UH and UJ Fines Dryers - On or about May 22, 2015, and at times prior to, the employer did not develop, document, or utilize alternative measures for the control of potentially hazardous energy of air-actuated butterfly valves (dump valves) when employees routinely cleared process clogs at the discharge lines of the fines dryers, thus exposing employees to caught-in and crushed-by hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $7000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.1020 D01 II
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2015
- Abate by
- May 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1020(d)(1)(ii): Each employee exposure record was not preserved and maintained for at least thirty years.(a)(Specify exposure records) a) At the At the Facility - On or about October 23, 2015 and at times prior to, complete medical records associated with an employees medical treatment for a work-related skin condition noted on the employers OSHA 300 logs for the 2005 calendar year, were not maintained, resulting in a chemical hazard. b) At the At the Facility - On or about October 23, 2015 and at times prior to, complete medical records associated with an employees medical treatment for a work-related skin condition noted on the employers OSHA 300 logs for the 2006 calendar year, were not maintained, resulting in a chemical hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $7000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.1020 E01 I
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2015
- Abate by
- May 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1020(e)(1)(i): When an employee or designated representative requested access to a record, the employer did not ensure that access was provided in a reasonable time, place, and manner: a) At the Facility - On or about June 2, 2015 and at times prior to, an employee who requested medical information regarding treatment for a previous work-related skin condition that occurred sometime around 2005 was not informed that the employer had documentation of the previous skin conditions the employee had incurred, resulting in a chemical hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.4 A
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,100 · Current $1,100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.4(a): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent. a) At the At the Facility On or about October 26, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not record a work-related injury on the OSHA 300 Form or equivalent for the 2015 calendar year for an employee who was treated for a work-related wrist injury on July 7, 2015.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $1100
- — C (O) $1100
- — Z (O) $1100
1904.7 B04
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,100 · Current $1,100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(4): The employer did not correctly classify the following work-related injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent: a) At the At the Facility On or about October 26, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not classify work-related injury, case number 201-2015-0455 as Job transfer or restriction in Column (I) on the OSHA 300 form for the 2015 calendar year, for which the employee was given modified or restricted work duties.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $1100
- — C (O) $1100
- — Z (O) $1100
1904.29 B02
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,100 · Current $1,100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(2): The employer did not fill out or correctly fill out an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for each recordable injury or illness. a) At the Facility On or about October 26, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not complete an OSHA 301 or equivalent form for an employee who was treated for a work-related wrist injury on July 7, 2015.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $1100
- — C (O) $1100
- — Z (O) $1100
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Onsite Medical Clinic - On or about June 15, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not provide adequate hazard communication training for employees who came in contact with hazardous chemicals including but not limited to acrylic acid, acrylamide, caustic soda, dimethylaminoethylacrylate, ammonia, and acetic acid, resulting in a chemical hazard.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at SNF Holding Company
Jun 16, 2022
RICEBORO, GA
Jun 26, 2019
RICEBORO, GA
May 21, 2019
RICEBORO, GA
Apr 2, 2019
RICEBORO, GA
May 4, 2017
RICEBORO, GA
View SNF Holding Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325998)
Jul 15, 2026
Hyera INC · WILLOWS, CA
Jul 15, 2026
Blue Line Corporation · SAN ANTONIO, TX
Jul 7, 2026
Clements Fluids · CHARLOTTE, TX
Jun 29, 2026
ICE Crystal Engineering · KINDRED, ND
Jun 23, 2026
161409 - Premier Magnesia, LLC · WAYNESVILLE, NC
More inspections in GA
Jul 16, 2026
U.S. Department of Treasury · CHAMBLEE, GA
Jul 16, 2026
Rehrig Pacific Company · LAWRENCEVILLE, GA
Jul 16, 2026
Pure Beauty Farms, INC. · GREENSBORO, GA
Jul 16, 2026
Polynt Composites USA INC. · FOREST PARK, GA
Jul 16, 2026
GF Casting Solutions Augusta, LLC · AUGUSTA, GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340699214.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.