Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ZACHRY GROUP, LLC

Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of ZACHRY GROUP, LLC in 10350 HWY 185N GREEN LAKE COMPLEX, PORT LAVACA, TX 77979 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 340700251.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Zachry Group, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Zachry Group, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ZACHRY GROUP, LLC
Site address
10350 HWY 185N GREEN LAKE COMPLEX
City
PORT LAVACA
State
TX
ZIP
77979
Mailing
P.O. BOX 240130, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78221
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238220
Employees
67
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2015
Abate by
Dec 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000

Hazardous substances 1440

29 CFR 1910.119(h)(3)(iv): The contract employer did not assure that each contract employee followed the safety rules of the facility including the safe work practices required by paragraph (f)(4) of this section:    On June 10, 2015, at the Heads Column, DA-0501 at the INEOS Nitriles Green Lake Facility, the employer's implementation of the host employer's  Opening Lines procedure, relating to hazardous chemicals in process piping, did not fully recognize the potential hazard to the operation.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.132 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2015
Abate by
Dec 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1440

29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  On June 10, 2015, the employer did not require the use of chemical-impervious clothing during the installation of a blind into process piping containing hydrogen cyanide, at the Heads Column, DA-0501 at the Ineos Nitrile, Green Lake facility.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.134 D01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2015
Abate by
Dec 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000

Hazardous substances 1440

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability:  On June 10, 2015, the employer did not select the proper respirator for use by an employee engaged in the installation of a blind into process piping containing hydrogen cyanide, at the Heads Column, DA-0501 at the Ineos Nitrile, Green lake facility.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2015
Abate by
Dec 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000

Hazardous substances 1440

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  On June 10, 2015, the employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazards, including a reasonable estimate of employee exposure to hydrogen cyanide during installation of a blind into process piping at the Heads Column, DA-0501 at the Ineos Nitrile, Green Lake facility.  Where a reasonable estimate of an employee exposure to hydrogen cyanide could not be made; the employer did not consider the hydrogen cyanide atmosphere to be immediately dangerous to life and health.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.147 D05 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2015
Abate by
Dec 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1440

29 CFR 1910.147(d)(5)(ii): Where there was a possibility of re-accumulation of stored energy to a hazardous level, verification of isolation was not continued until the servicing or maintenance was completed, or until the possibility of such accumulation did not exist:  On June 10, 2015, the employer did not verify the isolation of hydrogen cyanide until the possibility of such accumulation did not exist during installation and removal of blinds from process piping at the Heads Column, DA-0501 at the Ineos Nitrile, Green Lake facility.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

View Zachry Group, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340700251.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.