Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SWEET MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SWEET MANUFACTURING COMPANY in 2000 EAST LEFFEL LANE, SPRINGFIELD, OH 45505 (NAICS 333922). OSHA activity number 340701390.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sweet Manufacturing Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sweet Manufacturing Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2000 EAST LEFFEL LANE
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
OH
ZIP
45505
Mailing
2000 EAST LEFFEL LANE, SPRINGFIELD, OH 45505
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333922
Employees
67
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 24, 2015
Abate by
Jan 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,273 · Current $1,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 26109135

29 CFR 1910.132(b):  Where employees provided their own protective equipment, the employer did not assure its adequacy, including proper maintenance, and sanitation of such equipment.    (a)  The employer did not inspect employee-owned equipment, such as respirators and prescription glasses, to ensure it was adequate as required for the welders who welded galvanized metal.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $3273

1910.133 A03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,964 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 26109135

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee who wore prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involved eye hazards wore eye protection that incorporated the prescription in its design, or wore eye protection that could be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses.    (a)  On or about June 15, 2015, a welding employee was observed wearing non-safety prescription lenses with side shields instead of safety glasses in the workplace.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1964

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 67 exposed
Issued
Nov 24, 2015
Abate by
Jan 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,273 · Current $1,700 Reduced

Hazardous substances 26109135

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:    (a)  The employer did not implement the medical evaluation and training sections of the respiratory protection standard when they permitted welders who welded galvanized metal to wear respirators for voluntary use.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $3273

1910.1000 A02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 24, 2015
Abate by
Jan 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 26109135

29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of zinc oxide fume listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 5.0 milligrams per cubic meter:  (a)  On or about July 1, 2015, a welder on the leg line was exposed to zinc oxide fume at 17.4 milligrams per cubic meter, or 348% of the OSHA permissible exposure limit, for a 452 minute sampling period with a value of zero added for the 28 minutes not sampled, while welding galvanized steel.    (b)  On or about July 1, 2015, a welder on the leg line was exposed to particulates not otherwise regulated (total dust) at 38.2 milligrams per cubic meter, or 255% of the OSHA permissible exposure limit, for a 452 minute sampling period with a value of zero added for the 28 minutes not sampled, while welding galvanized steel.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5390

View Sweet Manufacturing Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340701390.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.