Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MEADE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MEADE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC in I-55 AND N. RIVER RAND (EXIT 241), WILMINGTON, IL 60481 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 340702166.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Meade Electric Company, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Meade Electric Company, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
I-55 AND N. RIVER RAND (EXIT 241)
City
WILMINGTON
State
IL
ZIP
60481
Mailing
9550 W. 55TH ST., MC COOK, IL 60525
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238210
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2015
Abate by
Aug 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $4,410 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there are potential electrical hazards shall be provided with, and shall use, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed.     a.  On or about June 11, 2015 - at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was required to troubleshoot and/or repair the 240 volt, UGH1 Lamp Tower.  The employee troubleshooting the live parts, including but not limited to a 240 volt circuit, did not use electrical protective equipment including voltage-rated gloves and flame resistant clothing.  The employee was thereby exposed to the hazards associated with live electrical parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4410
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.335 A02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2015
Abate by
Aug 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(2)(i): When working near exposed energized conductors or circuit parts, each employee shall use insulated tools or handling equipment if the tools or handling equipment might make contact with such conductors or parts. If the insulating capability of insulated tools or handling equipment is subject to damage, the insulating material shall be protected.  a.  On or about June 11, 2015 - at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was required to troubleshoot and/or repair the 240 volt, UGH1 Lamp Tower.  The employee troubleshooting the live parts, including but not limited to, a 240 volt circuit did not use insulated tools.  The employee was thereby exposed to the hazards associated with live electrical parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.333 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2015
Abate by
Aug 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $4,410 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(1): "Application." This paragraph applies to work on exposed deenergized parts or near enough to them to expose the employee to any electrical hazard they present. Conductors and parts of electric equipment that have been deenergized but have not been locked out or tagged in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section shall be treated as energized parts, and paragraph (c) of this section applies to work on or near them.    a.  On or about June 11, 2015 - at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was required to troubleshoot and/or repair a 240 volt, UGH1 Lamp Tower.  The conductors and parts of the electric equipment have not been locked out or tagged, thereby exposing the employee to electrical shock and/or arc flash/blast hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4410
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.333 B02 III C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2015
Abate by
Aug 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(iii)(C): "Application of locks and tags." If a lock cannot be applied, or if the employer can demonstrate that tagging procedures will provide a level of safety equivalent to that obtained by the use of a lock, a tag may be used without a lock.  a.  On or about June 11, 2015 - at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was required to troubleshoot and/or repair a 240 volt, UGH1 Lamp Tower.  A lock was not applied, and the employer did not demonstrate that tagging procedures will provide a level of safety equivalent to that obtained by the use of a lock, thereby exposing the employee to electrical shock and/or arc flash/blast hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Meade Electric Company, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340702166.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.