DE PERE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: ROMO DURABLE GRAPHICS INC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ROMO DURABLE GRAPHICS INC in 800 HERITAGE RD., DE PERE, WI 54115 (NAICS 323110). OSHA activity number 340704873.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROMO DURABLE GRAPHICS INC
- Site address
- 800 HERITAGE RD.
- City
- DE PERE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54115
- Mailing
- PO BOX 800, DE PERE, WI 54115
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323110
- Employees
- 150
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,295 · Current $1,607 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee used the respirator in the workplace: a) On or about June 15, 2015, the employee working in the Reclaim Room had not been medically evaluated while voluntarily wearing a half mask cartridge respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1606.5
- — Z (S) $2295
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,060 · Current $2,142 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operators and other employees from hazards created by ingoing nip points and pinch points: a) On or about June 15, 2015, the E-3 Line output conveyor tail pulley ingoing nip points were not guarded in the Production Area. b) On or about June 15, 2015, the Sukurai output conveyor tail pulley ingoing nip points were not guarded in the Production Area. c) The Large Carousel screen printing system automated frames pinch points were not guarded in the Production Area. d) The Small Carousel screen printing system automated frames pinch points were not guarded in the Production Area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2142
- — Z (S) $3060
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,825 · Current $2,678 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Points of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employees from having any part of their body in the danger zones during operating cycles: a) On or about June 15, 2015, the Sheeter #1 guard opening to the shear was too wide in the Production Area. b) On or able June 15, 2015, the Greig 54 inch Laminator single beam presence sensing device location did not prevent employee hands from reaching the ingoing nip point created by the calendars.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2677.5
- — Z (S) $3825
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323110)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340704873.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.