DALLAS, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: TEODORO DIAZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TEODORO DIAZ in 16916 PARK HILL DRIVE, DALLAS, TX 75248 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340716059.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TEODORO DIAZ
- Site address
- 16916 PARK HILL DRIVE
- City
- DALLAS
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75248
- Mailing
- 649 NORTH FOURTH STREET, GARLAND, TX 75040
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: (a) Employees using Hitachi nail guns were exposed to eye injuries and were not protected by the use of safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $400
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor was an alternative fall protection plan which meets the requirements of �1926.502(k) developed and implemented: (a) Employees roofing a residential single family house were exposed to fall hazards and were not protected by the use of a personal fall arrest system or safety net system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340716059.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.