Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RB ODER CONSTRUCTION CO.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other health inspection of RB ODER CONSTRUCTION CO. in 3407 CAMP SWITCH ROAD, LONGVIEW, TX 75604 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 340722560.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RB Oder Construction CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RB Oder Construction CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3407 CAMP SWITCH ROAD
City
LONGVIEW
State
TX
ZIP
75604
Mailing
1100 SANDERS STREET, GLADEWATER, TX 75647
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2015
Abate by
Dec 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C), and (c)(4)(ii)(D):    a) The employer did not develop energy control procedures that clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, the following:      The procedure for the change out of filters, which required the opening of process equipment, did not include the following: a specific statement of the intended use of the procedure; specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy; specific procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them; and, specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2015
Abate by
Dec 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Each authorized employee did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:    a) The employer did not ensure that each authorized employee, prior to opening process equipment to change filters, received training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C05 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2015
Abate by
Dec 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii): Lockout devices and tagout devices were not singularly identified; and, did not meet the requirements in paragraphs 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(A) through (D):    a) Pink ribbon used as a tagout device when breaking lines and opening process equipment was not constructed so that exposure to weather conditions or wet and damp locations would not cause the tag to deteriorate; it was not substantial enough to prevent inadvertent or accidental removal; it did not indicate the identity of the employee, who applied the device; and,  it did not warn against hazardous conditions if the equipment is energized and did not include a legend such as the following: Do Not Start. Do Not Open. Do Not Close. Do Not Energize. Do Not Operate, etc.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.147 D04 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2015
Abate by
Sep 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(iii): Tagout devices, where used, were not affixed in such a manner as to clearly indicate that the operation or movement of energy isolating devices from the "safe" or "off" position is prohibited:  a) Pink ribbon, which was used as a tagout device when breaking lines and opening process equipment, was not affixed in such a manner as to clearly indicate that the operation or movement of energy isolating devices from the "safe" or "off" position is prohibited.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340722560.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.