JACKSONVILLE, FL —
OSHA Inspection: ANTHONY'S STUCCO CO.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANTHONY'S STUCCO CO. in 10135 BEDFORD LAKES CT. LOT 112, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32244 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 340728195.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANTHONY'S STUCCO CO.
- Site address
- 10135 BEDFORD LAKES CT. LOT 112
- City
- JACKSONVILLE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32244
- Mailing
- 12472 LAKE UNDERHILL DRIVE 408, ORLANDO, FL 32828
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On or about June 24, 2015, an employee using a NR83A2 Hitachi pneumatic nail gun was not wearing safety glasses, exposing himself to being hit by nails or flying debris.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1440
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about June 24, 2015, on a 4:12 pitch (lower) roof, an employee performing lathing operations was not protected from a 9-foot 10-inch fall hazard by use of a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or any alternative fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jul 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: a. On or about June 24, 2015, an employee used a 6-foot a-frame improperly, in that the ladder was positioned on a 4:12 pitch lower roof, being used in the closed position, exposing the employee to a 9-foot 10-inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Anthony'S Stucco CO.
View Anthony'S Stucco CO.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340728195.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.