Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: A CUT ABOVE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of A CUT ABOVE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. in 1001 MCQUEEN STREET, PEORIA, IL 61602 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 340730787.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A CUT Above Property Management, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A CUT Above Property Management, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1001 MCQUEEN STREET
City
PEORIA
State
IL
ZIP
61602
Mailing
150 WESLEY ROAD, CREVE COEUR, IL 61610
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561730
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.67 C02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2015
Abate by
Sep 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(v): The employer did not ensure a body belt was worn and a lanyard attached to the boom when working from an aerial lift:   Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while operating a vehicle mounted aerial lift to perform tree trimming operations and a suitable fall protection was not being used.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2015
Abate by
Sep 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment:    Employees were exposed to struck by hazards, eye injuries, and fall hazards while performing tree trimming operations and the employer did not assess the workplace.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2015
Abate by
Sep 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:    The employer did not develop and document a personal protective equipment hazard assessment for the tasks performed by employees when performing tree trimming operations and a written certification did not include the name of the person who certified that the evaluation had been performed, and the date that the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.135 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2015
Abate by
Sep 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1): Each affected employee did not wear a protective helmet when working in areas where there was a potential head injury from falling objects:    Employees working at a residential home site were exposed to potential head injury from falling tree limbs during tree trimming operations and the employees were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2015
Abate by
Sep 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards:    An employee was exposed to flying wood chips while operating a chain saw to cut tree limbs, and the employee was not required to wear safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.133 A02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2015
Abate by
Sep 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(2): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used eye protection that provided side protection when there was a hazard from flying objects.   An employee was exposed to flying wood chips while operating a chain saw to cut tree limbs, and the employer did not ensure that the prescription glasses worn by an employee were impact resistant and had side shields.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.133 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2015
Abate by
Sep 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee who wears prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involve eye hazards wears eye protection that incorporates the prescription in its design, or wears eye protection that can be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses:  An employee was exposed to flying wood chips while operating a chain saw to cut tree limbs, and the employee wore prescription glasses that did not protect the employee from flying wood chips.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340730787.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.