PEORIA, IL —
OSHA Inspection: A CUT ABOVE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of A CUT ABOVE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. in 1001 MCQUEEN STREET, PEORIA, IL 61602 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 340730787.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- A CUT ABOVE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Site address
- 1001 MCQUEEN STREET
- City
- PEORIA
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61602
- Mailing
- 150 WESLEY ROAD, CREVE COEUR, IL 61610
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561730
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.67 C02 V
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(v): The employer did not ensure a body belt was worn and a lanyard attached to the boom when working from an aerial lift: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while operating a vehicle mounted aerial lift to perform tree trimming operations and a suitable fall protection was not being used.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: Employees were exposed to struck by hazards, eye injuries, and fall hazards while performing tree trimming operations and the employer did not assess the workplace.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done: The employer did not develop and document a personal protective equipment hazard assessment for the tasks performed by employees when performing tree trimming operations and a written certification did not include the name of the person who certified that the evaluation had been performed, and the date that the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.135 A01
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1): Each affected employee did not wear a protective helmet when working in areas where there was a potential head injury from falling objects: Employees working at a residential home site were exposed to potential head injury from falling tree limbs during tree trimming operations and the employees were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards: An employee was exposed to flying wood chips while operating a chain saw to cut tree limbs, and the employee was not required to wear safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.133 A02
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(2): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used eye protection that provided side protection when there was a hazard from flying objects. An employee was exposed to flying wood chips while operating a chain saw to cut tree limbs, and the employer did not ensure that the prescription glasses worn by an employee were impact resistant and had side shields.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.133 A03
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee who wears prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involve eye hazards wears eye protection that incorporates the prescription in its design, or wears eye protection that can be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses: An employee was exposed to flying wood chips while operating a chain saw to cut tree limbs, and the employee wore prescription glasses that did not protect the employee from flying wood chips.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561730)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340730787.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.