Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AL STAR RECYCLING, LLC

Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of AL STAR RECYCLING, LLC in 10608 ALDINE WESTFIELD, HOUSTON, TX 77093 (NAICS 562119). OSHA activity number 340734680.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch AL Star Recycling, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for AL Star Recycling, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10608 ALDINE WESTFIELD
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77093
Mailing
10608 ALDINE WESTFIELD, HOUSTON, TX 77093
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562119
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2015
Abate by
Sep 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $5,600 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer does not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from the recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees performing recycling tasks during elevated heat conditions were exposed to excessive heat:      This violation occurred on or about June 24, 2015, at the facility where an employee was exposed to excessive heat conditions when performing recycling tasks such as, but not limited to, placing aluminum cans into a self-dumping hopper in an outdoor environment.       Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees are protected  from excessive heat conditions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5600
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.    The employer does not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction, practical training, and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. This violation was observed on or about June 25, 2015, at the facility where an employee was exposed to crushed-by hazards when operating a Hyster H60FT forklift to move recycled metal without forklift training.      Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each operator successfully completes the training required by paragraph (l) prior to permitting an employee to operate a forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.215 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2015
Abate by
Sep 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work:      The employer does not ensure that grinding machinery is used with work rests.  This violation was observed on or about June 25, 2015, on the front side of the business where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-in hazards when using a Dayton 7 inch pedestal grinder to grind brass for assessment without a work rest.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that grinding machinery is used with work rests.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.215 B09

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2015
Abate by
Sep 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:      The employer does not ensure that the distance between the abrasive wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue guards do not exceed one-fourth inch.  This violation was observed on or about June 25, 2015, on the front side of the business where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-in hazards when using a Dayton 7 inch pedestal grinder to grind brass for assessment without a tongue guard.       Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that the distance between the abrasive wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue guards do not exceed one-fourth inch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2015
Abate by
Oct 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):        The employer does not ensure that a written hazard communication program is developed.  This violation was observed on or about June 25, 2015, at the facility where employees were exposed to fire and contact hazards when using propane to power a forklift without developing a written program.      Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that a written hazard communication program is developed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 H02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(ii): The employer did not provide information to the employees on operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals were present:      The employer does not ensure that employees are provided with information for operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals are present.  This violation was observed on or about June 25, 2015, at the facility where employees were exposed to fire and contact hazards when using propane to power a forklift without providing hazard communication training.          Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees are provided with information for operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals are present.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2015
Abate by
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:      The employer does not ensure that safety data sheets (SDSs) for each hazardous chemical used are maintained.  This violation was observed on or about June 25, 2015, at the facility where employees were exposed to fire and contact hazards when using propane to power a forklift without maintaining the SDS.      Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical used are maintained.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340734680.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.