Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AEROFLEX METELICS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AEROFLEX METELICS in 54 GRENIER FIELD RD #3, LONDONDERRY, NH 03038 (NAICS 334413). OSHA activity number 340741370.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aeroflex Metelics — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aeroflex Metelics is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AEROFLEX METELICS
Site address
54 GRENIER FIELD RD #3
City
LONDONDERRY
State
NH
ZIP
03038
Mailing
54 GRENIER FIELD RD #3, LONDONDERRY, NH 03038
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
334413
Employees
83
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 D03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3): All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s):    Location: CVD chase  On or about 6/29/15, The employer did not ensure the 480 volt disconnect supplying power to a glassing furnace employees were working on was locked out.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.332 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 2, 2015
Abate by
Oct 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:  Location: facility On or about 6/29/15, employees required to perform maintenance and repairs to equipment with electrical hazards were not provided training on electrical safe work practices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.335 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 2, 2015
Abate by
Oct 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with, and/or did not use, electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed:  Location: facility On or about 6/29/15, employees were not provided electrical protective equipment while testing electrical circuits to ensure they were de-energized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Aeroflex Metelics's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340741370.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.